June 18, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 21, 2006
Engineering and Public Policy
11.687.1 - 11.687.10
Hold Paramount: Designing an Engineering Education to Open Minds and Serve the Public Good Engineering and Public Policy Division
The NSPE Code of Ethics states engineers “shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public and conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession...” In this paper, rather than discuss the teaching of engineering ethics, the author will explore the significance of the “hold paramount” principle for engineering educators, the engineering curriculum, and its potential impact on public policy and the student body. How we teach engineering may in fact dominate the ethical and societal lessons we wish to teach. Questions explored include: How can one effectively and practically teach fundamental engineering concepts in a way that will equip our graduates to embody these ideals? Does this principle instruct us, as engineers and educators, to focus on public policy and our society’s technological choices? Finally, how can we, as engineering educators teach students to responsibly tackle the ethical questions that lack a quantitative answer? An introduction of a three- tiered approach to encompass the range of issues involved is described. Specifically, strategies from chess instruction, computer games, and the potential power of a graduate with knowledge of competence, self, and the surrounding world are described.
In Gunn and Vesilind’s book of the same name, Hold Paramount,1 they skillfully prod and poke at the ethical issues facing professional engineers that most of us wish would just go away. If everyone were honest and honorably motivated then these problems wouldn’t exist, we rationalize. We find these tricky questions of right and wrong, honesty and duty to self and society, frustrating, puzzling, even painful. As they aptly state: “There seem to be lots of different points of view in ethics, and not everyone will agree on the best solution to an ethical problem. Too bad the ethicists can’t be as efficient as the engineers.” Ethical problems are different from engineering problems, right? In engineering problems there is one right answer. But in the profession of engineering the real quandary lies not in the answer, but in asking the right questions. After a brief calculation an engineer decides, yes, a beam can support 500 kg.
Womeldorf, C. (2006, June), Hold Paramount: Designing An Engineering Education To Open Minds And Serve The Public Good Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 10.18260/1-2--989
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2006 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015