Saad, H. S. (2018, June), Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing  Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30611

\bibitem{asee_peer_30611}
  Saad, H. S. (2018, June), \emph{Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing}
  Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah.
  10.18260/1-2--30611

Hani Serhal Saad.  "Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing".  2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2018.  https://peer.asee.org/30611 Internet.  11 Jul, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_30611}
  Hani Serhal Saad.
  "Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing".
  \emph{2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2018.
  https://peer.asee.org/30611 Internet.  11 Jul, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_30611
author = "Hani Serhal Saad"
title = "Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing"
booktitle = "2018 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition "
year = "2018"
month = "June"
address = "Salt Lake City, Utah"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/30611}
number = {10.18260/1-2--30611}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Teaching technical writing to engineering students is a challenging task since they are very math oriented and reluctant to recognize the importance of the topic. But communication is most definitely an engineering asset that any successful engineer must have. The goal of this research is to compare the technical writing performance of students before and after a series of changes were implemented in the university’s technical writing course ‘Laboratory Analysis and Reports’. These changes included providing more feedback to students, allowing them to resubmit assignments after an initial grading, reading assignments in front of the class, reading, summarizing and discussing technical papers in addition to other laboratory exercises. The results are evaluated by grading a number of student final projects from the pre and post-changes cases. The final project is an extensive report on a fictitious experiment the students have designed and supposedly executed. The idea is not to have them execute the experiment, but write effectively about it. Grading is done without the grader knowing whether the student is from a class where these changes were implemented or not. The assessment was done using six criteria that include: (a) document structure (b) objectives and conclusion, (c) grammar and spelling, (d) quality of writing, (e) depth of analysis and (f) scientific integrity. The results obtained show increases of 8% for categories (a), (c) and (d) , 14% for category (b), 7% for category (f) and a decrease of 3% for category (e). These results suggest that the changes implemented had a positive impact on the technical writing level of the students. 
 

AU  - Hani Serhal Saad
CY  - Salt Lake City, Utah
DA  - 2018/06/23
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/30611
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--30611
ER  -