Asee peer logo

Improving Creativity In A Graduate Course

Download Paper |

Conference

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Louisville, Kentucky

Publication Date

June 20, 2010

Start Date

June 20, 2010

End Date

June 23, 2010

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Professional Graduate Education and Industry

Tagged Division

Graduate Studies

Page Count

11

Page Numbers

15.692.1 - 15.692.11

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/15680

Download Count

16

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Robert Brooks Temple University

author page

Naji Khoury Temple University

author page

Fernando Tovia Philadelphia University

author page

Tony Singh Temple University

author page

Hossein Rostami Philadelphia University

author page

Amithraj Amavasai Temple University

author page

Keerthi V. Takkalapelli Temple University

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

IMPROVING CREATIVITY IN A GRADUATE COURSE

Abstract

The authors developed a strategy for improving students’ creativity in CE 723 – Pavement Systems Management, a graduate course in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The course taught in Summer 2004 was taken as the control group. This was taught using traditional lecture method. In Spring 2007, this course was taught using the strategy developed in this study. The strategy consisted of creative opportunities provided by the assignments given to the students, creativity on theoretical aspects of a specially designed test and student presentations of the solutions of the assignments. The assignments consisted of a series of modules for minimizing average vehicle delay to clear a busy signalized traffic intersection. Students were encouraged to think outside the box and come up with creative solutions from traffic engineering, geometric design, and signal design considerations. Several examples of creativity were given to the students in the form of handouts. Except this strategy, there was no difference between the control group and the Creative group.

The improvements of all the six performance indices over the control group were determined using t tests. The improvements of all the indices were statistically significant at an alpha value of 0.05. Among the six indices, improvement in student presentations of the solutions to the assignments was ranked the highest. The authors consider this index to be the most important among the 6 indices because it provided the most number of creative avenues for the students. In this category, the control group had scored 52% on the average whereas the Creative group scored 65%. The Creative group showed a 25.0% improvement over the control group.

Brooks, R., & Khoury, N., & Tovia, F., & Singh, T., & Rostami, H., & Amavasai, A., & Takkalapelli, K. V. (2010, June), Improving Creativity In A Graduate Course Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/15680

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015