Carlson, P., & Russell, A. A., & Waggenspack, W. N., & Wilmot, C. G., & Bowles, B., & Voltmer, D. R., & Monroe, W. T., & Hull, W. R., & Raubenheimer, D. (2012, June), Improving Engineering Education with Enhanced Calibrated Peer Review Assessment of a Collaborative Research Project   Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--21501

\bibitem{asee_peer_21501}
  Carlson, P., \& Russell, A. A., \& Waggenspack, W. N., \& Wilmot, C. G., \& Bowles, B., \& Voltmer, D. R., \& Monroe, W. T., \& Hull, W. R., \& Raubenheimer, D. (2012, June), \emph{Improving Engineering Education with Enhanced Calibrated Peer Review Assessment of a Collaborative Research Project }
  Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.
  10.18260/1-2--21501

Patricia Carlson, Arlene Ann Russell, Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Chester G. Wilmot, Boz Bowles, David R. Voltmer, W. Todd Monroe, Warren R Hull Sr. P.E., and Dianne Raubenheimer.  "Improving Engineering Education with Enhanced Calibrated Peer Review Assessment of a Collaborative Research Project ".  2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2012.  https://peer.asee.org/21501 Internet.  12 Jan, 2025

\bibitem{asee_peer_21501}
  Patricia Carlson, Arlene Ann Russell, Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Chester G. Wilmot, Boz Bowles, David R. Voltmer, W. Todd Monroe, Warren R Hull Sr. P.E., and Dianne Raubenheimer.
  "Improving Engineering Education with Enhanced Calibrated Peer Review Assessment of a Collaborative Research Project ".
  \emph{2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, 2012, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2012.
  https://peer.asee.org/21501 Internet.  12 Jan, 2025

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_21501
author = "Patricia Carlson, Arlene Ann Russell, Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Chester G. Wilmot, Boz Bowles, David R. Voltmer, W. Todd Monroe, Warren R Hull Sr. P.E., and Dianne Raubenheimer"
title = "Improving Engineering Education with Enhanced Calibrated Peer Review Assessment of a Collaborative Research Project "
booktitle = "2012 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2012"
month = "June"
address = "San Antonio, Texas"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/21501}
number = {10.18260/1-2--21501}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -           Improving Engineering Education with Enhanced Calibrated Peer Review –                      Assessment of a Collaborative Research ProjectCalibrated Peer Review (CPRTM) is an online application that was developed to enable studentsto critically review other students’ written assignments as a learning tool for their own writtenwork. This paper describes the results of a project to create an enhanced version of CPR, bothto allow for the input and review of visual and spoken (video) components by students and alsoto permit the expansion of this functionality to the 2500 assignments that have already beendeveloped. The primary objectives of this project grant follow:   •   Create an enhanced version of CPRTM (Version 5), both to allow for the input and review       of visual and oral (video) components by students and also to permit the expansion of       this functionality to the 2500 assignments that have already been developed by the       100’s of faculty in the 950 institutions who have current CPR accounts on the UCLA       server.   •   Train engineering faculty at the collaborating institutions in the development and use of       visually rich CPR assignments.   •   Develop pedagogically driven assignments for a set of core engineering courses.   •   Assess the impact of the integration of writing and visual communication on course       development, student performance, and student confidence in communication skills.Development of CPR (Version 5) was completed to accommodate input and access to visualtools. This version was beta-tested and revised, allowing for existing assignments in version 4to be modified to accept graphical and visual input.Complications in uploading student work and accessing calibration artifacts, as well asdifficulties in the assignment authoring process, suggest a need for upgrades to the interfacebetween the central assignment database and the enhanced version of CPR. Despite thesechallenges, however, participating engineering faculty successfully completed the developmentand implementation of assignments, and students were able to calibrate and participate inonline peer review of communication assignments in core engineering courses. While facultyencountered obstacles when attempting to seamlessly integrate video components, videotapedoral presentation assignments were shown to be adaptable to the CPR format. Students alsocompleted technical poster assignments and dimensioning assignments involving engineeringgraphics.
AU  - Patricia Carlson
AU  - Arlene Ann Russell
AU  - Warren N. Waggenspack Jr.
AU  - Chester G. Wilmot
AU  - Boz Bowles
AU  - David R. Voltmer
AU  - W. Todd Monroe
AU  - Warren R Hull Sr. P.E.
AU  - Dianne Raubenheimer
CY  - San Antonio, Texas
DA  - 2012/06/10
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Improving Engineering Education with Enhanced Calibrated Peer Review Assessment of a Collaborative Research Project 
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/21501
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--21501
ER  -