June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
26.918.1 - 26.918.5
Building community to improve Freshman Retention in an Engineering Technology Program High freshman attrition in engineering programs is a significant and growing concern. In2010 and 2011, 45% of first year freshman received a grade of D or F in first semester coursessuch as EET 101, our introductory circuits course, while a grade of C or better is required tograduate in the program. Freshman retention efforts described in this paper resulted in a 17%improvement in freshman retention for fall 2012. We unexpectedly found that prior academic performance is not a good predictor ofstudent success in first year engineering programs. Students must have demonstrated a highlevel of academic success in their high school work to be admitted to the program. This priorsuccess implies they will be successful at the college level, but in practice we do not find thisresult. Evaluation of student records and student interviews show that some of the leastsuccessful first year students achieved the highest levels of performance in high school. Undeveloped study skills are a likely cause of student failure. We hypothesized that topstudents in high school were not challenged and did not have to work hard to achieve highgrades. As a result, they did not have to develop strong study skills and are therefore not wellprepared for college. When thrust into the university environment, they must then either developthose skills very quickly or fail, and sadly many of the students are not able to make thetransition quickly enough. Preliminary work shows a 17% improvement in freshman retention as a result of theprograms implemented. Programs that support development of community, increase studentengagement, and provide training in study skills can improve freshmen retention. Studentretention issues were addressed with a dual approach that combined intentional effort to buildcommunity among the students along with the engagement of peer mentors. Within theclassroom, community building efforts included a number of fun exercises to encourage thestudents to learn each other’s names. In addition, in lab students were paired in groups selectedby the instructor to ensure that each student worked with every other student during the semester.A student club was formed to provide a platform to involve sophomore students as peer mentors.This club was formed and run by the sophomore students with faculty acting in a primarilyadvisory role. This club provided exam review, homework assistance, and study skill trainingsessions, as well as fun activities such as game nights and technical activities such as simplemicroprocessor projects. These programs were implemented in Fall 2012 and resulted in a 17%improvement in freshman retention for this semester.
Sprang, R., & Strom, S. A. (2015, June), Improving Freshman Retention in an Engineering Technology Program Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24255
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015