June 16, 2002
June 16, 2002
June 19, 2002
7.644.1 - 7.644.13
Main Menu Session 1360
Improving the Chemical Engineering Curriculum through Assessment: Student, Faculty, Staff, Alumni, and Industry Input
Sean Clancey, Jason M. Keith, and Anton J. Pintar Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931
In response to requirements set forth by ABET2000 for the accreditation of engineering programs, the Deptartment of Chemical Engineering at MTU has been assessing its curriculum since 1995 (as described in a prior conference proceedings 1) using a series of assessment tools developed over the succeeding six years. Three of the tools, the department skills test and the senior exit surveys and interviews, were implemented for the first time in 1999. This paper will discuss the results of our assessments, focusing on 1999-2001, and how the department is using those results to improve instruction.
The eight tools of the MTU Chemical Engineering Assessment Program are the following: skills test, analysis of design reports, senior exit interview, alumni survey, writing portfolio, oral presentation skills, safety program, and performance on fundamentals of engineering exam.
Tool #1–Skills Test
Tool #1 in the department’s assessment plan is “department designed skills test to be given to the students in the Spring Quarter in the Unit Operations Laboratory. The test will measure fundamental knowledge, design skills, and problem solving skills.” The metric is “60% pass rate (>70 out of 100 score).”
A multiple-choice test with 22 questions was given late in the Spring Quarter, 2001 to eighty-three graduating seniors. This test was different than the previous year, when the test was composed of 13 questions. The students were bribed to take the exam by offering free pizza. However, many took it seriously when told it helped with accreditation. The questions covered the following areas: Fundamentals (basic definitions, unit conversions, mass balances, and energy balances); Transport Phenomena (fluid flow, heat transfer, and mass transfer); Thermodynamics; and Kinetics/Reactor Design. The overall results of the test are summarized in Table 1 below.
60% of the students answered 13/22 questions or better for a score of 59% or better on the exam. Only 19% of the students answered the required 16/22 or better to achieve at least a 70% score (considered passing by this metric). It is proposed to use the same exam next year to try and get an
Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
Clancey, S., & Pintar, A., & Keith, J. (2002, June), Improving The Chemical Engineering Curriculum Through Assessment: Student, Faculty, Staff, Alumni, And Industry Input Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--11198
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015