Asee peer logo

Improving Written Communication Skills In University Engineering / Technology Programs: The Grading Nightmare

Download Paper |

Conference

2000 Annual Conference

Location

St. Louis, Missouri

Publication Date

June 18, 2000

Start Date

June 18, 2000

End Date

June 21, 2000

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

9

Page Numbers

5.348.1 - 5.348.9

DOI

10.18260/1-2--8446

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/8446

Download Count

352

Paper Authors

author page

Sharyn L. Switzer

author page

Chris S Ray

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session _____

Improving Written Communication Skills in University Engineering / Technology Programs: The Grading Nightmare

Christopher S. Ray, Sharyn L. Switzer Purdue University

Introduction

The necessity of communicating in engineering and technology careers is of the utmost importance. Companies’ and employees’ success, in many instances, depends on their ability to communicate in a clear, complete, concise, and accurate manner. A significant number of university programs require various language skills ranging from basic English to technical report writing. Yet, employers still indicate that newly hired graduates have an extremely difficult time preparing internal memorandums, business or technical letters, and reports.

One of the major complaints from faculty members teaching these skills is the overwhelming and time-consuming process of grading assignments. As a result, many faculty reduce the number of required writing assignments to a minimum. Requiring students to prepare only three or four written assignments during the semester may make grading easier, but the students’ writing skills are adversely affected by this shortsightedness of quality versus quantity 1. This paper presents one method of requiring students to write a significant number of documents while maintaining minimum faculty-grading time.

Objective

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate how the Purdue University Building Construction Management department utilizes Microsoft Word 2000 Readability Statistics in assisting and evaluating student writing skills. The primary course used in this study was the course in Construction Documentation and Administration.

Construction Documentation and Administration deals primarily with the correspondence and written portion of the commercial construction process. Students were required to write a significant number of letters, reports, memorandums, and Requests for Information (RFI).

Switzer, S. L., & Ray, C. S. (2000, June), Improving Written Communication Skills In University Engineering / Technology Programs: The Grading Nightmare Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8446

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015