Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
June 22, 2008
June 22, 2008
June 25, 2008
2153-5965
Electrical and Computer
14
13.738.1 - 13.738.14
10.18260/1-2--4284
https://peer.asee.org/4284
525
INCREASING STUDENT RETENTION AND COMPREHENSION BY PROVIDING EVERY STUDENT THEIR OWN INDUSTRY STANDARD TOOLS IN INTRODUCTORY ENGINEERING CLASSES
Abstract:
Recent improvements in the design of microcontrollers and the availability of free development tools now allow each student to have access to state of the art development tools and hardware. Students must be provided access to these industry leading tools to be competent and competitive in the marketplace.
A study to be conducted at Washington State University will measure changes in student performance and retention when first year engineering students have exposure and unlimited access to state of the art development tools and hardware. Data will be collected from surveys, exams, project reports, laboratory assignments, and homework. Quantitative data will be analyzed by comparison to historical data gathered from student groups that did not have exposure to and unlimited access to development tools. Qualitative data will be used to determine the subjective quality of each student’s experience.
Each student will be given a Digilent CerebotII board that contains an Atmel ATMega64L microcontroller. The ATMega64L microcontroller is an industry standard device that features several peripheral devices, including timers, serial communication methods and analog to digital converters. The CerebotII has 52 user configurable I/O pins, multiple power supply options and will be used in several projects ranging from toggling an onboard LED to controlling a complex robot. The CerebotII will be programmed using the Atmel’s free AVR Studio 4 IDE that can compile code written in either C or assembly.
Specific outcomes will include assessing whether retention of students in engineering related studies increases; whether the overall learning process was improved; whether students have a better knowledge of modern technologies and development methods; and whether student comprehension of founding concepts improves.
Introduction:
Teaching microcontroller systems courses to undergraduate students present many challenges. These challenges include selecting appropriate microcontroller topics, microcontroller hardware units, and development software. Microcontroller courses comprise fundamental concepts from electrical engineering, computer engineering, and computer science disciplines. Exploring electrical characteristics of microcontrollers, computer architecture, and assembly language programming are a few of these key concepts. Assortments of microcontrollers are available that may be applied to an undergraduate microcontrollers course. Selecting a microcontroller that allows students to apply classroom ideas freely to physical hardware devices is a daunting task. Further, discovering an embedded microcontroller board that supports simple interfacing with peripheral devices and that uses robust tools is perhaps more daunting. This paper discusses a
O'Fallon, A., & Hagemeister, J. R., & Cole, C., & Harris, J. (2008, June), Increasing Student Retention And Comprehension By Providing Every Student Their Own Industry Standard Tools In Introductory Engineering Classes Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--4284
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015