Louisville, Kentucky
June 20, 2010
June 20, 2010
June 23, 2010
2153-5965
Computers in Education
11
15.760.1 - 15.760.11
10.18260/1-2--16032
https://peer.asee.org/16032
418
Results: Figure 2 is an example table we used to evaluate course objective for CSET3150 Algorithm course. All the major courses have a table developed for assessment. Over the years, the tables can be modified to meet new requirements for continuous improvement. Figure 3 shows the evaluation matrix mapped Abet A through K to each course. Course evaluation using a course form maps the result from each course to this matrix. In Assessment meeting, CSET faculties evaluate the whole curriculum. Courses that are not meeting requirement will be improved or modified to close the loop. Minute from 2007 assessment meeting showed that most courses have met the requirement with 80% or more of the students having grade B or above. Some courses needed improvement. Our introduction course CSET1100 as example, had a high attrition rate. The programming language we used was not effective enough. Faculty committee decided to switch to Python, a nicer language with built in Object Oriented feature and multimedia support. Clicker technique was also introduced to the class to improve teacher student interaction in class. The clicker technique turns out to be so popular that we decide to employ it throughout the all the major classes. The University of Toledo Computer Science & Engineering Technology Program Program Courses Mapped to Program Outcomes 2-Apr-07 ENGT 1000
ENGT 2000
ENGT 3010
ENGT 3050
ENGT 4050
EECS 1590
EET 2210
EET 2230
EET 2410
EET 2420
EET 3350
EET 4250
CSET 1100
CSET 1200
CSET 2200
CSET 3150
CSET 3300
CSET 3600
CSET 4100
CSET 4250
CSET 4750 Required Courses
a) Mastery of knowledge, techniques of discipline b) Ability to apply current knowledge c) Ability to conduct experiments d) Ability to apply creativity in design e) Ability to function on teams f) Ability to identify, analyze and solve problems g) Ability to communicate effectively h) Recognition of lifelong learning i) Understand profesional, ethical, social responsibility j) Knowledge of profesional, societal, global issues k) Commitment to quality and improvement
Figure 3. Assessment Matrix
Solarek, D., & Wang, H., & Rioux, A., & Evans, W., & sun, W. (2010, June), Integrating Computer Science And Engineering Technology To Implement An Abet Accredited Program Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. 10.18260/1-2--16032
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015