Albuquerque, New Mexico
June 24, 2001
June 24, 2001
June 27, 2001
6.619.1 - 6.619.20
Integrating the Mechanical Engineering Core
Donald E. Richards Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
This paper describes a new paradigm for integrating engineering courses—a systems, conserva- tion and accounting, and modeling approach. The paper presents a historical background of this approach and discusses the motivation. The overall framework is presented, including the impor- tant concepts and definitions, the basic conservation and accounting equations, and a common problem solving approach. A detailed development is presented for conservation of linear mo- mentum to illustrate how the equations are developed. Several examples are included to demon- strate how students solve problems using problem-specific models developed from the general equations instead of using a “plug-and-chug” approach. Experience with using this approach for teaching and curriculum design is discussed. Results to date indicate that this approach can im- prove student performance and help them develop a more integrated understanding of material that has traditionally been taught as unrelated topics.
Imagine for a moment what it is like to be a freshman or sophomore engineering student. After a heavy dose of physics, chemistry, and mathematics, you are excited to finally be taking engineer- ing courses. Although you may have done well in physics, you discover that engineering courses are noticeably different, and you may struggle with them. Faced with a plethora of apparently un- related courses, you (and sometimes the faculty teaching the courses) miss the underlying con- cepts and themes. To you, it seems these courses are a set of unrelated topics each with its own special set of tricks.
As faculty teaching these courses, we are frequently struck by our students’ failure to make con- nections. Why can’t they see the connections? Who among us hasn’t felt frustration when a stu- dent asks “Which free-body diagram do you want, the physics one, the statics one, the dynamics one, or the one from fluid mechanics?” Or “Which energy balance should I use, the one from physics, dynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, or thermodynamics.”a
a My thanks to Lynn Bellamy and Don Evans for sharing the stories underlying these quotations.
Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education
Richards, D. (2001, June), Integrating The Mechanical Engineering Core Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 10.18260/1-2--9421
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015