Asee peer logo

Intel: Interactive Toolkit For Engineering Education

Download Paper |

Conference

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Mechanics and the Internet

Tagged Division

Mechanics

Page Count

12

Page Numbers

13.778.1 - 13.778.12

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/3197

Download Count

29

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Calvin Ashmore Georgia Institute of Technology

author page

Bo Yeon Lee Georgia Institute of Technology

author page

Geoff Thomas Georgia Institute of Technology

author page

Daniel Upton Georgia Institute of Technology

author page

Sneha Harrell UC Berkeley

author page

Christine Valle Georgia Institute of Technology

author page

Wendy Newstetter Georgia Institute of Technology

author page

Janet Murray Georgia Institute of Technology

author page

Laurence Jacobs Georgia Institute of Technology

author page

Sue Rosser Georgia Institute of Technology

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

InTEL : Interactive Toolkit for Engineering Learning Abstract Statics, a foundational engineering course, introduces a unique approach to problem solving, which is characterized by model-based reasoning. The major intended course outcome is for students to develop the ability to create and utilize free body diagrams as a mechanism for describing and constraining a problem. This ability to abstract and define an idealized problem from complex objects in the world or textual descriptions ratchets the engineer's ability to solve the problem. Sadly, however, students routinely leave this course having learned to "plug and chug" or jump to a mathematical equation without first defining the problem in a diagrammatic form that articulates the underlying principles. This can lead to serious problems in future courses as the fundamental approach to engineering problem solving has not been understood or embraced. As a foundational course, difficulties here can impact student academic confidence resulting in a diminished sense of self-efficacy that is particularly problematic when amplified by gender and under-represented (URM) minorities issues. And such faltering so early in the major can cause a student to leave engineering.

While difficulties in the course arise for several reasons, our project seeks to address the problem of context. Our hypothesis is that women and minorities particularly, and students generally, are more likely to do well in statics when the problems are placed in the context of real world usefulness. An approach to teaching that effectively scaffolds students' efforts at model building and connects abstract principles/concepts to real world, every day applications will benefit all students while promoting diversity in engineering. Towards that end, we are developing InTEL (Interactive Toolkit for Engineering Education), a computer-based manipulable environment that supports teaching and learning in statics by mapping images from real-world environments to abstract diagrams for 2D and 3D equilibrium problems. With such digital technology, statics professors will be able to offer students important scaffolding for developing model-based reasoning by contextualizing abstract concepts and principles in lifelike models. Interacting with and manipulating these models will help students develop the kind of intuition that characterizes engineering reasoning and problem solving.

Introduction Numerous national studies have pointed to the need to increase enrollment in engineering programs and to graduate a more diverse population of engineers, although the exact numbers and level of training remain controversial1. China, India, and other developing countries produce many more engineers than the United States 2, while many industrialized nations, including the United Kingdom, South Korea, Germany, and Japan, produce a higher percentage of science and engineering graduates than the U.S. 3. Currently one fourth of the U.S. science and engineering workforce is over 50 and one third of them were born outside the U.S.3, but visa restrictions and increased international competition are expected to reduce the number of international students studying and remaining to work in the United States engineering workforce after graduation 4. African American, Hispanic and other racial/ethnic minorities make up 6% of the S&E workforce, and women make up 25%. These percentages contrast sharply with the demographics of these groups in the current overall population and workforce; by 2020 over 40% of college-aged students will be racially/ethnically diverse3.

Ashmore, C., & Lee, B. Y., & Thomas, G., & Upton, D., & Harrell, S., & Valle, C., & Newstetter, W., & Murray, J., & Jacobs, L., & Rosser, S. (2008, June), Intel: Interactive Toolkit For Engineering Education Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org/3197

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015