Investigating Graduate Students’ Perspectives of Influences on Interdisciplinary Scholar Identity Development: An Ecological Systems Theory Approach

Margaret E.B. Webb; Marie C. Paretti

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Baltimore , Maryland
Publication Date: June 25, 2023
Start Date: June 25, 2023
End Date: June 28, 2023
Conference Session: Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 7: Developing Graduate Students' Competencies and Identities
Tagged Division: Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
Page Count: 20
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--43873
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/43873
Download Count: 146

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Margaret E.B. Webb Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

visit author page

Margaret (Maggie) Webb is a master's and Ph.D. student in sustainable land development (civil engineering) and engineering education, respectively, at Virginia Tech. She graduated with her mechanical engineering degree from Rice University and worked for ExxonMobil as a subsea engineer and as a high school STEM teacher in a Houston charter school before starting grad school. Her research interests include supporting the needs of displaced engineering students, understanding the supports and barriers to educational continuity for engineers in a disaster context, and preparing engineering students interdisciplinarity to address disasters in their work. She works as a graduate research assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.

visit author page

biography

Marie C. Paretti Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-6928

visit author page

Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication, collaboration, and identity in engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

In light of the grand challenges and big ideas associated with the next generation of research, interdisciplinary graduate programs are on the rise. These programs are seeking to prepare the future professoriate with the ability to span and collaborate across disciplines, knowing that existing disciplinary programs do not always provide these professional development skills outside of more traditional expertise, particularly in STEM. Prior research has elucidated key barriers to the success of these interdisciplinary programs in terms of sustainability and academic excellence over time, highlighting the siloed nature of universities, conflicting policies and expectations across disciplines, as well as resourcing challenges (Welch-Devine et al., 2018). But, efforts tend to take a quantitative approach, usually focusing on educators’ perspectives on student development and research output and graduation rates as markers for success alone. As such, student voices tend to be left out, and whether these interdisciplinary graduate programs are enabling students to transition to interdisciplinary career research is a question left unaddressed.

In an effort to expand definitions of what makes an interdisciplinary program effective, this paper is grounded in Ecological Systems Theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1979) and investigates what graduate students in an interdisciplinary graduate program focused on disaster resilience have to say about what influences their preparation for cross-disciplinary research collaborations after graduation. This conference paper asks, (1) what influences graduate students’ abilities to develop a strong sense of interdisciplinary scholar identity, critical to self-efficacy and professional development, as they become professors in interdisciplinary spaces, and (2) what are graduate students’ perceptions of the interrelationship between various layers of their academic environment (i.e., microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem) and their interdisciplinary scholar professional identity development? This study takes a qualitative approach to assess interdisciplinary scholar professional development, using 48 semi-structured interviews across three cohorts (i.e., 24 participants where the first cohort consisted of 9 students, the second cohort of 3, and the third of 12) and three years (i.e., some students have multiple interviews, providing longitudinal data) to extend previous inquiry by shining a light on student-identified constraints and enablers of interdisciplinary research at the graduate level.

Ultimately findings on these influences on interdisciplinary professional identity development suggest that the cultural and historical background of universities as sites of disciplinary, department-driven initiatives, serves to challenge interdisciplinary graduate students seeking dissertation mentorship, paid work, and collaboration experience while building their professional identities as researchers and studying answers to grand challenges. The supports and barriers to this professional identity development process highlight the need for structural change within higher education institutions towards policies and procedures that better incentivize interdisciplinary research, teaching, and service for both graduate students and their faculty.

Citation
Format

Webb, M. E., & Paretti, M. C. (2023, June), Investigating Graduate Students’ Perspectives of Influences on Interdisciplinary Scholar Identity Development: An Ecological Systems Theory Approach Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43873

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - In light of the grand challenges and big ideas associated with the next generation of research, interdisciplinary graduate programs are on the rise. These programs are seeking to prepare the future professoriate with the ability to span and collaborate across disciplines, knowing that existing disciplinary programs do not always provide these professional development skills outside of more traditional expertise, particularly in STEM. Prior research has elucidated key barriers to the success of these interdisciplinary programs in terms of sustainability and academic excellence over time, highlighting the siloed nature of universities, conflicting policies and expectations across disciplines, as well as resourcing challenges (Welch-Devine et al., 2018). But, efforts tend to take a quantitative approach, usually focusing on educators’ perspectives on student development and research output and graduation rates as markers for success alone. As such, student voices tend to be left out, and whether these interdisciplinary graduate programs are enabling students to transition to interdisciplinary career research is a question left unaddressed. 

In an effort to expand definitions of what makes an interdisciplinary program effective, this paper is grounded in Ecological Systems Theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1979) and investigates what graduate students in an interdisciplinary graduate program focused on disaster resilience have to say about what influences their preparation for cross-disciplinary research collaborations after graduation. This conference paper asks, (1) what influences graduate students’ abilities to develop a strong sense of interdisciplinary scholar identity, critical to self-efficacy and professional development, as they become professors in interdisciplinary spaces, and (2) what are graduate students’ perceptions of the interrelationship between various layers of their academic environment (i.e., microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem) and their interdisciplinary scholar professional identity development? This study takes a qualitative approach to assess interdisciplinary scholar professional development, using 48 semi-structured interviews across three cohorts (i.e., 24 participants where the first cohort consisted of 9 students, the second cohort of 3, and the third of 12) and three years (i.e., some students have multiple interviews, providing longitudinal data) to extend previous inquiry by shining a light on student-identified constraints and enablers of interdisciplinary research at the graduate level. 

Ultimately findings on these influences on interdisciplinary professional identity development suggest that the cultural and historical background of universities as sites of disciplinary, department-driven initiatives, serves to challenge interdisciplinary graduate students seeking dissertation mentorship, paid work, and collaboration experience while building their professional identities as researchers and studying answers to grand challenges. The supports and barriers to this professional identity development process highlight the need for structural change within higher education institutions towards policies and procedures that better incentivize interdisciplinary research, teaching, and service for both graduate students and their faculty. 
AU  - Margaret E.B. Webb
AU  - Marie C. Paretti
CY  - Baltimore , Maryland
DA  - 2023/06/25
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Investigating Graduate Students’ Perspectives of Influences on Interdisciplinary Scholar Identity Development: An Ecological Systems Theory Approach
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/43873
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--43873
ER  -