Paper Authors

Abstract

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session XX10

K12 Engineering Education Field Experience

Lawrence J. Genalo, Celeste E. Ogren Iowa State University

Abstract

Engineering faculty have offered an engineering literacy course entitled Toying With TechnologySM to elementary and secondary education majors for eight years. Studies have shown that students form many of their overall career and educational attitudes as early as elementary school. Schoolteachers who have an appreciation for technology will likely convey that appreciation to their students. This will, in turn, broaden the horizons of their students regarding the opportunities they may have regarding careers in scientific and engineering disciplines. This appreciation is achieved through various engineering activities, many of which involve LEGO© robotics. Providing field experiences for future teachers so they can practice teaching the engineering-based activities they’ve learned is crucial in their development as confident teachers.

This paper will describe one semester’s extended field experience with a local 6th grade classroom and the companion 6th grade extended learning program (ELP) students. Hands-on, problem solving experiences are necessary in order to develop skills such as troubleshooting, innovation, and experimentation, which are national science, mathematics, and technology standards for 6th graders. Constructivist-based methodology is employed to create goals, expected outcomes, and the logistics for the field experience. The 6th graders use computers to follow step-by-step instructions, program their creations, and operate their systems. The students in the Toying With TechnologySM course serve as classroom facilitators for the engineering activities used to attain the goals and achieve the outcomes desired. Assessment of the success of the program is through multiple measures. These include: a written feedback from the 6th graders with answers to specific questions as well as any comments, observations and feedback by the TWT student facilitators during problem solving and design projects, interpretations of the results by the TWT class facilitator, and interviews with the collaborating in-service teachers.

Introduction/Need

“At the heart of our modern technological society lies an unacknowledged paradox. Although the United States is increasingly defined by and dependent on technology and is adopting new technologies at a breathtaking pace, its citizens are not equipped to make well-considered decisions or to think critically about technology. As a society, we are not even fully aware of, or conversant with, the technologies we use every day. In short, we are not ‘technologically literate.’”1

Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education

• Citation

• Format
  • APA
  • APA - LaTeX bibitem
  • MLA
  • MLA - LaTeX bibitem
  • Bibtex
  • EndNote - RIS

Genalo, L. (2005, June), K12 Engineering Education Field Experience Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--14223