Asee peer logo

Keeping In Touch With Your Class: Short Class Evaluations

Download Paper |

Conference

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Austin, Texas

Publication Date

June 14, 2009

Start Date

June 14, 2009

End Date

June 17, 2009

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Tagged Division

New Engineering Educators

Page Count

14

Page Numbers

14.825.1 - 14.825.14

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/5782

Download Count

30

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Mary Anderson-Rowland Arizona State University

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Keeping in Touch with Your Class: Short Class Evaluations

Abstract

Especially for a beginning or fairly new professor, a primary concern of teaching is the preparation of proper material for each class session. This paper discusses a way to determine how well the students are learning the material, especially in quite large classes, as well as their opinions on the course. A search of the literature shows that the “Minute Manager” stands out as an easy and effective way to receive continuous feedback on the delivery of a course. This paper describes how the author has adapted the Minute Manager for use in her courses and program seminars.

The questions asked on the Minute Manager evaluation are: 1) What was the most important thing that you learned today? 2) What did you like most about the class today? 3) Do you have any questions about the class today? Are there topics that are muddy? 4) Do you have any questions about the course? and 5) Comments. At the bottom of the brightly colored half page, the student is asked to circle the overall rating of the class from 1 = Excellent to 5 = Very Poor.

The paper will discuss uses of the Minute Manager, the types of answers that can be expected, and the student impressions of their use in a junior-level statistics problem-solving class for engineers.

I. Introduction Do you remember what it was like as you walked to your first class as a professor at a college or university? With a newly minted Ph.D., the professor walks to her first assigned class and is conscious that no one is watching and no one is checking to see what will be delivered in the lecture, let alone if the material delivered is correct. The professor is a bit aghast at the whole scenario, but then remembers that she has earned a Ph.D. degree. Because of this degree, the newly acquired faculty colleagues trust that a new professor is responsible, knows the material, and knows how to teach. Of course the new professor soon learns that no one has to be in the classroom to check on the teaching. If a professor, especially a new one, is not doing well in a course, the students immediately report problems to the department chair. However, the new professor feels OK about the class because she taught a few courses as a graduate teaching assistant. In those circumstances, the course syllabus was set and a graduate student was not individually responsible for preparing the tests, but the new professor did teach. So the new professor is prepared to teach. Or is she? Whether a professor is new or seasoned, a primary concern is the effectiveness of her teaching. Are the students learning what they need to learn? The general class learning can be measured by quizzes and exams. Professors receive feedback from the students through the teaching evaluation at the end of the semester. It would be nice, however, for the professor to know how well she and the students are working together long before a final teaching evaluation. Even though the lectures may have been academically correct, it is possible that the professor may be

Anderson-Rowland, M. (2009, June), Keeping In Touch With Your Class: Short Class Evaluations Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/5782

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015