St. Louis, Missouri
June 18, 2000
June 18, 2000
June 21, 2000
5.428.1 - 5.428.11
Learning More From Class Time: Technology Enhancement in the Classroom
Marilyn J. Smith, Narayanan Komerath School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
The traditional classroom lectures in engineering do not permit professors or students to keep pace with technological changes within rapidly changing disciplines. By using technology, the classroom lecture can be modified so that class time becomes a laboratory of learning and reinforcement through iteration and application. This approach is also very timely since it directly develops the engineering attributes set forth in ABET 2000 Criterion 3. Traditional teaching methods have relied on the Capstone Design classes to fulfill the tasks of tying four years of learning together, as well as to fulfill the ABET 2000 Criterion 3. The methods described herein permit effective implementation of the ABET guidelines across many classes using technology as the leveraging tool.
This paper discusses how this methodology was developed for two senior-level classes: Vibration and Flutter (required core class) and Flow Diagnostics (an elective class). The paper describes in further detail the classroom experiences, examples of the implementation, and the results of the assessment. Positive and negative factors from teacher and student viewpoints are also discussed, including the Hawthorne effect and how students with different learning styles behave with respect to the new methodology introduced in these classes. While the two classes discussed herein are Aerospace Engineering classes, the techniques are applicable across any engineering discipline.
The rapid pace of technology has created a dilemma for engineering educators. There is a certain amount of core theoretical material that must be covered so that a basic understanding of the mathematical and physical principles are understood by the student. The students may develop the "ennui" syndrome while learning this material, which may ultimately lead to retention problems. In addition to the core material, there are always new research developments that change or extend the course topics, which must also be squeezed into an already full course curriculum. Finally, it has always been a priority of professors at Georgia Tech to introduce some applications to develop the "practical" skills of the students. The ABET 2000 Criterion 31 recognizes the importance of this as a goal2.
One weakness in many engineering syllabi is that most of the "practical" applications are left to the senior Capstone Design courses. Thus, the student gains the false impression that design is where all of the "exciting" and "practical" work is performed. This false impression can have two major impacts. First, the student may not interview well in areas other than design. In addition, this can lead to a large pool of students designating their field of interest as design in
Smith, M. J. (2000, June), Learning More From Class Time : Technology Enhancement In The Classroom Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. https://peer.asee.org/8538
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015