June 23, 2013
June 23, 2013
June 26, 2013
23.856.1 - 23.856.19
Learning Statics by Feeling: Effects of Everyday Examples on Confidence and Identity DevelopmentEngineering educators looking to design optimum learning experiences for their classes nowhave several proven instructional methods to consider including active learning, use of everydayexamples in engineering, and situated/experiential learning. As students encounter gatewaycourses along the engineering degree path, that they must pass and understand well to besuccessful in subsequent courses, the adoption of these instructional methods instead of thetraditional lecture-based model is a promising way to keep students engaged while learningfundamental technical subjects. These newer instructional techniques are useful to maintainstudent interest and morale through the technical core engineering courses required during thesecond and third years of an engineering degree, in which real-world projects are difficult to fitinto the crowded curriculum and students can lose the applied reality of engineering principleswithin abstract theory and equations. Greater emphasis on teaching using relevant examples hasbeen studied and promoted by programs such as the Engage Engineering - Everyday Examples inEngineering project as educators strive to keep practicality alive even when teaching studentsabstract methods of engineering analysis . While evidence supports greater studentengagement and conceptual knowledge gains due to the use of everyday examples, the effects onstudent identity development and confidence have not been explicitly related to the type ofinstruction they receive.A novel teaching approach, the Body-Based Approach, uses the frameworks of active learning,everyday engineering examples, and situated learning, and is being adopted for recitations as partof an Engineering Statics course in Fall 2012 at a large public university. An experimental studywith over 200 sophomore Mechanical Engineering students, this approach is being administeredthrough weekly mandatory recitations which complement traditional lectures offered twice aweek (n=200). A total of 6 recitation sections are split equally into two flavors depending on thetype of examples used: Body-Based or External. All recitations incorporate active learningactivities and awareness of the situated process of learning, with care taken to select relevant andeasily relatable examples for students to physically interact with and learn from. While the Body-Based Approach uses different aspects of the body and internal body sensations to illustrateconcepts like Forces, Moments, Friction, Equilibrium, and Distributed Loading, the ExternalApproach uses more traditional examples including C-clamps, desk chairs, trees, and othercommon objects that are separate from the body but still tangible. During recitations, studentswork in small groups of 3 to 4 students to complete a variety of learning activities using eitherBody-Based or External examples, under the guidance of two co-instructing RecitationInstructors. The resulting changes to student conceptual knowledge, feelings of belonging,confidence, and engagement are being examined both quantitatively and qualitatively during thecourse of the semester.This paper introduces the research design, provides examples of the curriculum, and details onexecuting such a course model with a team of Recitation Instructors. Additionally, initialanalysis of the Pre-/Post- Concept Inventories and Pre-/Post- Engineering Attitudinal Surveyswill be presented for discussion.Keywords: Active learning, situated learning, everyday examples Campbell, P. et al. “Integrating Applications in the Teaching of Fundamental Concepts.”American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. June 22-25,2008, Pittsburgh, PA.
Tsai, J. Y., & Kotys-Schwartz, D. A., & Hannigan, M. P. (2013, June), Learning Statics by Feeling: Effects of Everyday Examples on Confidence and Identity Development Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--19870
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015