July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
July 19, 2022
Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Biological and Agricultural Engineering
This paper is an evidence-based practice complete work that details positive and negative elements resulting from the sudden transition to emergency remote instruction and learning for a [program name] capstone course, as well as defines how these experiences have shaped the decision making for the upcoming offering. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the overnight transition from an in-person capstone course to a fully remote capstone course in March 2020 required instructors to think creatively about the capstone experience and how the core learning objectives could be met in the presence of a new set of constraints. The continued restrictions and challenges associated with in-person meetings for Fall 2020 continued to shape decision making around course design and structure. This paper addresses some of the lessons the instructors learned during the last weeks of the Spring 2020 semester, and how they are shaping the capstone experience going forward.
Reflecting on the last few weeks of the Spring 2020 semester, the instructors recognized several positive elements that emerged from the course. Students were very patient and flexible with the transition to remote instruction. Instructors were still able to provide meaningful and productive interactions with the whole group, smaller teams, and individual students using virtual meeting platforms like Zoom. Certain assignments were quickly redesigned for the new virtual platforms being used. Everyone involved learned and practiced new skillsets to continue working collaboratively in a virtual environment, and the class was more effective at including external stakeholders in the process.
However, several challenges also became apparent. The loose structure of the course, hasty adjustment of the project scope to accommodate remote work, and loss of access to information and resources had a significant impact on the students’ experiences. Final project outcomes were limited by circumstances, since the second semester is focused on fabrication and test. For some students, the experience and expectations for the more hands-on part of the project were particularly impacted. Added challenges associated with grieving the loss of a final semester, graduation ceremonies, and uncertain career prospects, and dealing with the uncertainty of the unknown added to the stress and anxiety felt by all involved.
Modifications implemented starting with the Fall 2020 capstone courses address some of the challenges experienced during the Spring 2020 semester, including adding more structure and organization to course content and communications, introducing cloud-based software programs, in particular looking at specific new CAD software, to support remote collaborations, and providing more intentional guidance for keeping students on track and organized during the design process. The possibility of returning to remote instruction mid-semester also influenced projects proposed by capstone partners.
Modenbach, A. A., & Peterson, M. M. (2021, July), Lessons Learned From a Covid-impacted Capstone Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37437
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015