Asee peer logo

Life After Tenure: Improved Instruction

Download Paper |


1996 Annual Conference


Washington, District of Columbia

Publication Date

June 23, 1996

Start Date

June 23, 1996

End Date

June 26, 1996



Page Count


Page Numbers

1.302.1 - 1.302.2

Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

R.H. Page

author page

L.S. Fletcher

Download Paper |

NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2252

Life After Tenure: Improved Instruction

R.H. Page, L.S. Fletcher Texas A&M University


Once tenure has been achieved, faculty should devote more attention to the students learning process. Innovative ways to package engineering instructional programs for increased student motivation are described. Certain types of technological problems are found to be more stimulating to the students than those addressed in the traditional lecture system. It is suggested that the student be introduced to real engineering problems throughout all four years of study. This style of instruction immerses the student in a learning environment where she or he can rapidly learn specific information, its relationship to other aspects of the problem, and the need for additional information. The professor then becomes more of a leader and stimulator, motivating the students, rather than serving as a traditional information delivery system. With this approach the professor deals with real world engineering discussions in the class room, and these discussions become the primary motivation for the student’s learning process. In addition, such an approach becomes a motivation for the professor’s learning process.


How are students motivated to learn? There are many ways to motivate students, but we have found that presenting them with challenging real-world problems is a much better approach than simply disseminating engineering information in a lecture format. Problems treating real-world engineering activities are particularly attractive to college students in that they take advantage of the students’ desire to learn. Those problems that deal with new technological situations are particularly appealing because most young people wish to do their part in improving the world. For example: the development of more fuel efficient automobiles, collision avoidance systems, airline security systems, new biomedical assistive devices, the control of fire storms, or the control of environmental pollution are all situations that lead to alluring engineering problems that should be solved. A systems approach to formulating the problem and discussions of alternative solutions permit students to decide what information they need to know in order to intelligently proceed with an analysis. The students then have a rationale for learning. They seek information with a strong emphasis on the basic engineering sciences and their application. In order to obtain related information they must turn to the library and computer searches for knowledge dealing with economics, politics, culture, and other real-world data. The professor utilizing this approach becomes more of a coordinator of the students learning process rather than a supplier of factual information.

$iiii’ } 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘.JHYR’,?

Page, R., & Fletcher, L. (1996, June), Life After Tenure: Improved Instruction Paper presented at 1996 Annual Conference, Washington, District of Columbia.

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 1996 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015