Salt Lake City, Utah
June 20, 2004
June 20, 2004
June 23, 2004
9.872.1 - 9.872.14
Linking Student Achievement to Program Outcomes Assessment
David A. Pape Saginaw Valley State University
Abstract In recent years, there have been numerous publications outlining the assessment plans that various institutions have put into place in response to the ABET EC 2000 criteria. In this paper an outcomes assessment process which includes direct measures of student achievement in engineering classes is described. It is postulated that in a well-designed course, the student learning objectives for that course will necessarily have a high correlation with overall program outcomes. Further, faculty teaching such courses will naturally gather data relating to student performance on these course objectives. Therefore, it is logical to propose that this data be used independently of the classroom grading for the purpose of program outcome assessment.
Based on available literature, relatively few schools appear to be using student work in a formal way to assess program outcomes. This may be due to a variety of reasons, including legitimate questions that have been raised in the assessment literature regarding the validity of using transcript data to assess program outcomes. However, by not using graded course work, it is possible that a large quantity of potentially valuable assessment data that is routinely gathered by faculty is being overlooked. Exam and quiz problems, laboratory and project reports, oral presentations, and homework assignments, which are standard in virtually all engineering courses, generate assessment data that can be used not only for computing a student’s course grade, but also in a quantitative way for program level assessment and feedback. In fact, a few schools have reported that grades on assignments and examinations in individual courses has been the single most useful assessment instrument, providing feedback both to the student and to the instructor.
Important differences between the method suggested herein and the practice of using raw course grades (transcript data), average class grades, or other “smeared” data are described. The system for collecting and analyzing the data obtained by faculty and how this information is used to within the feedback loop is also illustrated.
Introduction The EC 2000 accreditation criteria require that an institution have in place a comprehensive outcomes assessment program to ensure the quality and continuous improvement of the educational process1. There have been many papers published in the last few years on the topic of assessment as it relates to the new criteria. Assessment may take place at the course level or at the program level2. Course level assessment attempts to ensure that in a particular course the required material is sufficiently well taught and understood. Program level assessment addresses the program outcome indicators as well as assessing the content, sequence, and integration of all courses within a program. Ressler and Lenox3 provide a program assessment model with integrated course level assessment that is being used at their institution. They correctly assert that these two levels of assessment are clearly not independent, and that “in a well integrated
Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education
Pape, D. (2004, June), Linking Student Achievement To Program Outcomes Assessment Paper presented at 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://peer.asee.org/13331
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2004 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015