Asee peer logo

Long On Students And Short On Equipment: An Effective And Well Received Method To Improve Laboratory Outcomes

Download Paper |

Conference

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Publication Date

June 22, 2008

Start Date

June 22, 2008

End Date

June 25, 2008

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Innovations in Laboratory Studies

Tagged Division

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

Page Count

2

Page Numbers

13.856.1 - 13.856.2

DOI

10.18260/1-2--3305

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/3305

Download Count

79

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Steven Walk Old Dominion University

visit author page

Steven R. Walk is an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology in the Frank Batten College of Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University. In addition to his focus on issues in undergraduate engineering education, Mr. Walk’s research interests include technology and innovation management, and technological forecasting and social change. He is owner and founder of Technology Intelligence, a management consulting company in Norfolk, Virginia. Mr. Walk earned BSEET and MSEE degrees from the University of Pittsburgh, where he was a University Scholar.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Long On Students and Short On Equipment: An Effective and Well Received Method to Improve Laboratory Outcomes Given Laboratory Equipment Constraints

Abstract

Colleges and universities experience temporary increases in student populations for many reasons, such as changes in local population demographics or the popularity of specific majors. These periods of high enrollment do not always justify expansion of laboratory assets such as construction of new workstations, purchase of new test equipment, or the addition of laboratory sessions. The result often is overcrowded laboratory sessions with oversized laboratory teams wherein students are at risk of not experiencing the quality or breadth of ‘hands on’ laboratory involvement considered necessary to meet even minimum outcomes requirements. Moreover, the instructor often feels significant stress attempting to give each student in each assignment the time required for thorough evaluation and useful comment to the student.

To overcome these obstacles and to maintain good laboratory outcomes during times of laboratory equipment constraints, the author has developed an innovative method to assure that each student is given adequate opportunity to learn, and that the instructor has ample time to assess and report learning progress and outcomes. Briefly, the method includes segmenting common or repeating laboratory procedures into specific tasks, such as, for example, preparation and construction, experimentation and data gathering, and analysis and conclusion. The number of tasks is equal to the number of members in the assigned laboratory team. During a laboratory assignment, each team member takes as his or her role responsibility for the team’s completion of one of the segmented tasks. For every new laboratory assignment, the team member roles are rotated among the segmented tasks. A single team-authored laboratory report is submitted for each laboratory assignment.

This effective and well received role-rotation method is described in detail and successful results of its implementation are presented.

Walk, S. (2008, June), Long On Students And Short On Equipment: An Effective And Well Received Method To Improve Laboratory Outcomes Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--3305

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015