Asee peer logo

Making A Partnership Work: Outcomes Assessment Of A Multi Task, Multi Institutional Project

Download Paper |

Conference

1997 Annual Conference

Location

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Publication Date

June 15, 1997

Start Date

June 15, 1997

End Date

June 18, 1997

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

18

Page Numbers

2.280.1 - 2.280.18

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/6673

Download Count

10

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Jens Jorgensen

author page

Lueny Morell de Ramírez

author page

José L. Zayas

author page

John Lamancusa

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2266

Making a Partnership Work: Outcomes Assessment of a Multi-Task, Multi-Institutional Project

Lueny Morell de Ramírez, José L. Zayas/University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, John Lamancusa/Penn State University Jens Jorgensen/University of Washington

This paper describes the Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership (MEEP) project's summative assessment strategy. Since 1994, three universities, Penn State, University of Washington and University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, in collaboration with Sandia National Laboratories, have been working together to develop a new, practice-based curriculum and physical facilities for product realization and manufacturing. The overall outcome is the development at each participating institution of what we call The Learning Factory. In addition to describing the project's four major tasks and deliverables, we present the assessment plan, its principal elements, and the tools used for qualitative evaluation. Finally, the paper highlights some of the assessment results and reviews some of the elements that made this partnership a success. The assessment strategy presented in this paper could be used as a model for similar multi- institutional, multi-task projects.

Background During the last decade, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has sponsored coalitions and partnerships between various higher educational institutions, which focus on enhancing undergraduate engineering education. The goals and objectives of these projects - oftentimes multi-million dollar, multi-institutional, and interdisciplinary - are carried out by working teams. In 1994, NSF granted (with funds from the ARPA Technology Reinvestment Program) a unique group of universities - Penn State, University of Washington and University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez - in collaboration with Sandia National money to a project called the Manufacturing Engineering Education Partnership (MEEP). The overall outcome of the project was the development of what we call The Learning Factory at each participating institution. The program calls for the development of a new practice-based curriculum and physical facilities for product realization and manufacturing. The major goal is to provide an improved educational experience that emphasizes the interdependency of manufacturing and design in a business environment. The overall outcome intended to graduate better engineering professionals exhibiting the knowledge and skills needed to succeed in the highly competitive world of today and tomorrow. The key element in this approach is active learning: the combination of curriculum revitalization coordinated with hands-on experiences. Thus, the gap is reduced between traditional lecture vs laboratory, academia

Jorgensen, J., & de Ramírez, L. M., & Zayas, J. L., & Lamancusa, J. (1997, June), Making A Partnership Work: Outcomes Assessment Of A Multi Task, Multi Institutional Project Paper presented at 1997 Annual Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. https://peer.asee.org/6673

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 1997 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015