Virtual Conference
July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
July 19, 2022
NSF Grantees Poster Session
8
10.18260/1-2--37476
https://peer.asee.org/37476
405
Dr. Heather Dillon is Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington Tacoma. Her research team is working on energy efficiency, renewable energy, fundamental heat transfer, and engineering education. Before joining academia, Heather Dillon worked for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as a senior research engineer.
Eric Anctil is a professor of media and technology in the School of Education at the University of Portland and the author of many books and articles on education. His work broadly centers on K-20 education and the nexus of media, technology, and the curriculum.
Dr. Carolyn James is the Calculus Coordinator at University of Portland in Oregon. As part of her role, she provides professional development to calculus faculty, oversees the training of undergraduate math tutors, and teaches in the math department. Her primary research interests include STEM faculty adoption of evidence-based practices, the relationship between instructor beliefs and practice, and institutional change of teaching cultures.
“Research I (R1) university” is a category that the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education uses to indicate universities in the United States that engage in the highest levels of research activity. There is currently no analogous classification for a T1 institution: institutions that engage in the highest levels of teaching activity. In Fall 2020, as part of an NSF IUSE project designed to enhance student-centered pedagogical practices and shift institutional culture, the research team hosted a symposium focused on the importance of teaching at the core of an institution. The attendees included 98 STEM faculty from several universities all interested in the topic of reflective teaching. Many of the participants had been trained in evidence-based instructional practices and faculty peer observation. A survey of participants asked these faculty to reflect on the idea of a T1 classification and how it might be framed in the broader conversation about enhancing STEM teaching. The survey responses were grouped based on change quadrants. The responses indicated alignment around reflective teaching, inclusive classroom practices, and recognition of excellence in pedagogy.
Prestholdt, T. E., & Dillon, H., & Anctil, E., & James, C. M., & Salomone, S. A., & Peterson, V. J. (2021, July), Making Teaching Matter More - The Making of a T1 University Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--37476
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015