Asee peer logo

Mapping ELE Initiatives: Approaches, Underlying Assumptions, and Conceptual Challenges

Download Paper |

Conference

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Columbus, Ohio

Publication Date

June 24, 2017

Start Date

June 24, 2017

End Date

June 28, 2017

Conference Session

The Big Picture in Engineering Education

Tagged Division

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

Page Count

17

DOI

10.18260/1-2--28650

Permanent URL

https://strategy.asee.org/28650

Download Count

212

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Donna M. Riley Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

visit author page

Donna Riley is Kamyar Haghighi Head of the School of Engineering Education and Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University.

visit author page

biography

Dean Nieusma Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-3315

visit author page

Dean Nieusma is Associate Professor in Science and Technology Studies and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

This paper investigates a range of approaches to Engineering and Liberal Education (ELE) integration, identifying the strategic and conceptual dimensions that drive them and some of their associated underlying assumptions. The analysis focuses on a set of purportedly exemplary case studies recently published as part of ASEE's Engineering-Enhanced Liberal Education (EELE) initiative. Drawing on theoretical insights from science and technology studies (STS) and engineering studies, the paper considers how various EELE cases manifest or resist (or both) some of the conceptual challenges of traditional engineering epistemologies, such as those around positivism, technical-social dualisms, and technological determinism. The paper finds that the EELE case studies, although embodying a variety of positive efforts in this regard, tend overwhelmingly to impose a patently engineering worldview upon liberal education instead of participating as one among many equally valid ways of knowing that is fundamental to liberal education. In this way, we argue, the EELE cases wittingly or unwittingly undermine, or even abandon, the foundational principles of liberal education.

Riley, D. M., & Nieusma, D. (2017, June), Mapping ELE Initiatives: Approaches, Underlying Assumptions, and Conceptual Challenges Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28650

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015