Asee peer logo

Mathematical Definitions: What Is This Thing?

Download Paper |

Conference

2000 Annual Conference

Location

St. Louis, Missouri

Publication Date

June 18, 2000

Start Date

June 18, 2000

End Date

June 21, 2000

ISSN

2153-5965

Page Count

7

Page Numbers

5.443.1 - 5.443.7

DOI

10.18260/1-2--8554

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/8554

Download Count

407

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Andrew Grossfield

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Session 2465

Mathematical Definitions: What is this thing?

Andrew Grossfield College of Aeronautics

Abstract

One sure way to turn students from the study of mathematics is to give them a mathematical definition. These one liners which jump out of nowhere are intended to be the conceptual starting point for five and six hundred page texts. An intelligent student is provided no basis to contest these mandated definitions, even if he does not understand or is confused by them.

New mathematical ideas have always been viewed with suspicion and historically have only been accessible to insiders. Mathematicians have always been under the gun of other mathematicians to justify everything asserted. As a result, a format of mathematics presentation arose that would provide for this justification. Nothing had to be easy to understand, as long as it made justifying, proving easy. Accept as a principle that it makes no sense to prove anything that is not understood. Math teachers conventionally violate the principle. They define something and then state and prove a theorem in the next breath. That is the model to which all traditional math teachers aspire.

Any student who objected too strongly to the meaninglessness of the mathematics regimen was banished to study Social Sciences or Arts. Few texts departed from the program. Only teachers who were schooled in the texts and proud of their mastery of the texts were considered competent.

Almost everyone teaching math today is a survivor of that dictatorial system, a master of the mathematical party line. Now the vogue is reform. Reform of what? Will computers or applications provide new, understandable definitions? Will computers or applications say what we are studying and why?

This paper considers mathematical definitions: π, variables, trig functions, functions, limits and derivatives. It provides examples of good and bad definitions in search of principles by which all students, even those who teach, can glimpse whether they should accept or reject what is being put on their plate.

Grossfield, A. (2000, June), Mathematical Definitions: What Is This Thing? Paper presented at 2000 Annual Conference, St. Louis, Missouri. 10.18260/1-2--8554

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2000 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015