Albuquerque, New Mexico
June 24, 2001
June 24, 2001
June 27, 2001
6.705.1 - 6.705.8
Measuring Cognitive Growth in Engineering Undergraduates: A Longitudinal Study
John Wise, Sang Ha Lee, Thomas A. Litzinger, Rose M. Marra, Betsy Palmer The Pennsylvania State University / University of Missouri / The University of Iowa
This paper builds on previously reported findings1,2 by describing the completion of a four-year longitudinal investigation into the cognitive development of engineering undergraduates as measured using the Perry Scheme of Intellectual Development.3 Fifty-four students were randomly selected during their first year and invited to participate in three hour-long interview sessions. During the interview, each student reflected on his or her view of knowledge, education, and learning. The interviews were transcribed and sent to a rater experienced in assigning positions relative to the Perry Scheme based on student responses to these types of questions. While it was hoped that students would progress from simple dualistic views (position 1 / 2) through complex dualism (position 3) and relativism (4 / 5) to commitment in relativism (position 6+), most students in this sample did not make it beyond position four. This paper will review the findings with an eye towards curricular activities that may or may not encourage this type of growth.
The move towards more active learning in engineering education has brought with it a need to assess the higher-order thinking that such environments and activities are thought to promote.3 At Penn State, we have been looking at undergraduate student development using the Perry scheme of intellectual development as a way to identify factors that contribute to the cognitive growth of students during a four or five year engineering program.
William Perry began asking undergraduates about their experiences at Harvard in the 1950s. 3 Using an open-content interview method, Perry was able to collect data reflecting the students’ epistemology. Common themes began to emerge, and he was able to identify what appeared to be a series of “positions” that change as the student experiences situations that are dissonant with their cognitive structures. The scheme begins with basic dualism (positions 1 and 2), proceeds through relativism (positions 3 through 5) and concludes with commitment within relativism (positions 6 through 9) [Table 1.]
Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education
Lee, S. H., & Palmer, B., & Marra, R. M., & Wise, J., & Litzinger, T. (2001, June), Measuring Cognitive Growth In Engineering Undergraduates: A Longitudinal Study Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico. https://peer.asee.org/9538
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2001 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015