Measuring Information Fluency Instruction: Ethical Use of Images in Engineering Student Presentations

Amber Janssen; William W. Tsai

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Tampa, Florida
Publication Date: June 15, 2019
Start Date: June 15, 2019
End Date: June 19, 2019
Conference Session: Teaching Engineering Students and Library Staff: New Ideas and Best Practices
Tagged Division: Engineering Libraries
Page Count: 17
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33091
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/33091
Download Count: 571

Paper Authors

biography

Amber Janssen California Maritime Academy

visit author page

Amber Janssen is an senior assistant librarian at California State University, Maritime Academy (CSUM). Her research background is in the instruction and assessment of information fluency in undergraduate education.

visit author page

biography

William W. Tsai California State University, Maritime Academy

visit author page

Dr. William W. Tsai is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at California State University, Maritime Academy (CSUM). His research background is fluid mechanics and heat transfer and is examining research topics in laboratory education in those fields. Prior to CSUM, Dr. Tsai was a Member of the Technical Staff in the Fluid Mechanics Group at The Aerospace Corporation. Dr. Tsai earned his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. at the University of California, Berkeley in Mechanical Engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

The ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, “Information Has Value” frame includes the knowledge practice of “articulate the purpose and distinguishing characteristics of copyright, fair use, open access, and the public domain.” This is an important consideration as engineering educations continue to put emphasis on teaching technical communication skills. While technical communication can take many forms, a common form in both education and industry is the use of presentations. However, one component of the presentations that can easily be overlooked by both students and faculty is ensuring the use of images that are obtained in an ethical manner. This area of instruction is a concern to both librarians and engineering instructors as it will be a recurring task in the engineering field after graduation. This paper presents a study examining the ethical use of images by students in presentations given for a Mechanical Engineering senior lab course. The objective of this research project was to determine if, and to what extent, integrating information fluency instruction pertaining to the ethical use of images into engineering lab sessions improves the quality of information fluency skills demonstrated in student presentations. A rubric was used to assess the use of images in student presentations for two criteria: 1) attribution and 2) use of images that have appropriate Creative Commons license, have public domain status, or are original creations. Students completed an initial lab presentation early in the semester with no information fluency instruction. Students then received direct in-person instruction in the ethical use of imagery from a librarian specifically developed for the purpose of this study. The students then completed a second lab presentation. Both presentations were scored using the rubric to compare the changes in information fluency skills of students pertaining to the ethical use of images. Then, the license type and attribution of the individual images in the presentations were determined. To better understand the trends that were captured, the measurements were also carried out on a control group from the prior academic year, where no instruction was given. The results showed some positive gains based on the instruction. The results from rubric-based assessment indicated improvement, although these measured increases in attribution and ethical use of images could not be definitively connected to the instruction alone. The image-based assessment demonstrated a significant improvement in attribution usage in the test group after the instruction. It also showed that students reduced the use of copyrighted images, although further study will be needed to definitively correlate the improvement to the instruction. The results also demonstrated some of the challenges encountered with using the rubric-based assessment. Going forward, a combination of the quantitative methods used in this study in combination with qualitative methods may help improve this instruction process.

Citation
Format

Janssen, A., & Tsai, W. W. (2019, June), Measuring Information Fluency Instruction: Ethical Use of Images in Engineering Student Presentations Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33091

TY - CPAPER
AB - The ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, “Information Has Value” frame includes the knowledge practice of “articulate the purpose and distinguishing characteristics of copyright, fair use, open access, and the public domain.” This is an important consideration as engineering educations continue to put emphasis on teaching technical communication skills. While technical communication can take many forms, a common form in both education and industry is the use of presentations. However, one component of the presentations that can easily be overlooked by both students and faculty is ensuring the use of images that are obtained in an ethical manner. This area of instruction is a concern to both librarians and engineering instructors as it will be a recurring task in the engineering field after graduation.
This paper presents a study examining the ethical use of images by students in presentations given for a Mechanical Engineering senior lab course. The objective of this research project was to determine if, and to what extent, integrating information fluency instruction pertaining to the ethical use of images into engineering lab sessions improves the quality of information fluency skills demonstrated in student presentations. A rubric was used to assess the use of images in student presentations for two criteria: 1) attribution and 2) use of images that have appropriate Creative Commons license, have public domain status, or are original creations. Students completed an initial lab presentation early in the semester with no information fluency instruction. Students then received direct in-person instruction in the ethical use of imagery from a librarian specifically developed for the purpose of this study. The students then completed a second lab presentation. Both presentations were scored using the rubric to compare the changes in information fluency skills of students pertaining to the ethical use of images. Then, the license type and attribution of the individual images in the presentations were determined. To better understand the trends that were captured, the measurements were also carried out on a control group from the prior academic year, where no instruction was given.
The results showed some positive gains based on the instruction. The results from rubric-based assessment indicated improvement, although these measured increases in attribution and ethical use of images could not be definitively connected to the instruction alone. The image-based assessment demonstrated a significant improvement in attribution usage in the test group after the instruction. It also showed that students reduced the use of copyrighted images, although further study will be needed to definitively correlate the improvement to the instruction. The results also demonstrated some of the challenges encountered with using the rubric-based assessment. Going forward, a combination of the quantitative methods used in this study in combination with qualitative methods may help improve this instruction process.

AU - Amber Janssen
AU - William W. Tsai
CY - Tampa, Florida
DA - 2019/06/15
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Measuring Information Fluency Instruction: Ethical Use of Images in Engineering Student Presentations
UR - https://peer.asee.org/33091
DO - 10.18260/1-2--33091
ER -