Asee peer logo

Model Of Students' Success: Important Factors Of Student Persistence In Engineering

Download Paper |

Conference

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Louisville, Kentucky

Publication Date

June 20, 2010

Start Date

June 20, 2010

End Date

June 23, 2010

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Student Poster Session

Tagged Division

Students Constituent Committee

Page Count

2

Page Numbers

15.879.1 - 15.879.2

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/16661

Download Count

29

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Joe Jien-Jou Lin Purdue University

author page

P.K. Imbrie Purdue University

author page

Qu Jin Purdue University

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Poster Model of Students’ Success in Engineering: Important Factors of Students’ Persistence

Abstract

Every year a group of quality graduates from high schools entered the engineering programs across this country, with remarkable academic record in terms of grade point average and standardized test scores. However, as reported in previous literatures, the substantial number of students switching out of engineering programs continues to be a major issue for most engineering institutions in United States. Studies have shown attrition in engineering programs as high as 50%, with a significant portion of this loss happened during or right after the first year.

Engineering students’ cognitive data from high school and their non-cognitive self-beliefs can be influential factors affecting their academic success and retention decision. In order to effectively study the influences from these factors, a Model of Student Success (MSS) in engineering has been developed and modified through the past five years in a large Midwestern university. The eleven cognitive attributes in MSS include high school GPAs, standardized test scores, and the grades and number of semesters in math, science and English courses in high school. The non- cognitive variables were collected through Student Attitudinal Success Instrument (SASI). The first phase of SASI covered the following nine constructs: Leadership, Deep Learning, Surface Learning, Teamwork, Academic Self-efficacy, Motivation, Meta-cognition, Expectancy-value, and Major Decision. Later in 2007, five new constructs were added into SASI. These new constructs are: Goal Orientation, Implicit Beliefs, Intent to Persist, Social Climate and Self Worth.

Cognitive and non-cognitive data, as well as students’ retention status after first year have been collected from the freshman cohorts of 2004-2009, with 1500 to 1700 entering students in each year. Several modeling methodologies have been applied to develop competing predictive models. These methods include neural networks, logistic regression, and structural equation modeling (SEM). These methods’ strength and weakness were studied and compared.

To be presented in this poster: 1) The motivation for developing Model of Student Success (MSS) in engineering. 2) The structure of MSS, with various cognitive and non-cognitive factors as inputs, and different measures of student success as outcomes. 3) The most important cognitive and non-cognitive factors on student persistence/retention identified by different modeling methods. 4) A comparison of modeling methods for student retention in engineering.

Lin, J. J., & Imbrie, P., & Jin, Q. (2010, June), Model Of Students' Success: Important Factors Of Student Persistence In Engineering Paper presented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky. https://peer.asee.org/16661

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2010 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015