Asee peer logo

Modeled Professionalism, Identity Concealment, and Silence: The Role of Heteronormativity in Shaping Climate for LGBTQ+ Engineering Undergraduates

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

Minoritization Processes and Equity in Engineering Education

Tagged Division

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Page Count

13

DOI

10.18260/1-2--43667

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/43667

Download Count

307

Paper Authors

biography

Brandon Bakka University of Texas at Austin Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-8342-1852

visit author page

Brandon Bakka is a doctoral candidate at the University of at Austin pursuing a degree in Biomedical Engineering with a certificate in engineering education. He received a BS in Chemical and Biological Engineering from Colorado School of Mines.

visit author page

author page

Travis Bouchard The University of Texas at Austin

biography

Vivian Xian-wei Chou University of Texas at Austin

visit author page

Vivian Chou is a M.S. student in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Biomechanics, graduating in May 2023 and a Graduate Research Assistant in the Center for Engineering Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Their research revolves around investigating how LGBTQ+ students resist the hostile culture of engineering and, more broadly, STEM. They mentor a group of LGBTQ+ undergraduate engineers and investigate the collective resistance by LGBTQ+ students through student driven organizations with them. They are especially interested in rethinking ways in which DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) can be approached to be more inclusive and effective.

visit author page

biography

Maura Borrego University of Texas at Austin Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-7131-4611

visit author page

Maura Borrego is Director of the Center for Engineering Education and Professor of Mechanical Engineering and STEM Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego is Senior Associate Editor for Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated that engineering students with LGBTQ+ identities feel marginalized in engineering spaces and refer to the climate as chilly and heteronormative. One salient theme in prior literature is social-technical dualism, which is the separation of technical and social aspects of engineering that typically excludes social aspects from engineering education experiences. The mechanisms that perpetuate social-technical dualism, and therefore a heteronormative engineering culture, are not yet well understood. The purpose of this analysis was to understand how social-technical dualism is perpetuated or maintained in undergraduate engineering spaces through the experiences of LGBTQ+ engineers. We conducted focus groups (n=4) and individual interviews (n=3) of students with these characteristics and thematically coded the interview transcripts. We found three main themes pertaining to the perpetuation of social-technical dualism in STEM: modeled professionalism, silence, and identity concealment. Modeled professionalism refers to how heteronormative professionalism is modeled by professors, teaching assistants, and faculty researchers. We refer to these people as dominant figures in engineering, because they play a substantial role in shaping how LGBTQ+ students perceive and develop engineering values. One way dominant figures in engineering typically reinforce the chilly, heteronormative culture of engineering is by showing how straightness is a key aspect of professionalism in engineering. However, our findings also show that dominant figures also have the influence to drastically change LGBTQ+ students’ perspective of professionalism when they choose to counter heteronormative narratives. The second theme, culture of silence, explores how LGBTQ+ feel unable or unwilling to give voice to their discomfort in the face of microaggressions and heteronormativity. LGBTQ+ students experience a lack of visible solidarity from their peers, contributing to a silent, chilly experience in engineering classrooms and lab environments. Our third theme, identity concealment, interrogates how students conceal their LGBTQ+ identities as a mechanism for survival in engineering. A lack of LGBTQ+ dominant figures in engineering, a culture of silence, and reinforcement that straightness is a professional requirement in engineering has perpetuated a cycle of identity concealment, where students without visible LGBTQ+ STEM role models feel less comfortable in their ability to safely come out in STEM spaces. One the other hand, some participants expressed that having an out mentor encouraged them to persevere in their field and resist heteronormative professionalism in engineering environments. Understanding the mechanisms that perpetuate social-technical dualism in engineering is paramount to creating inclusive, safe environments for LGBTQ+ students. We suggest ways in which dominant figures in engineering, such as professors, teaching assistants, and faculty researchers can disrupt the chilly, heteronormative culture of engineering by modeling inclusive classroom and lab practices. Additionally, we offer insights on how students negotiate their identity visibility in a chilly, heteronormative, and silent culture.

Bakka, B., & Bouchard, T., & Chou, V. X., & Borrego, M. (2023, June), Modeled Professionalism, Identity Concealment, and Silence: The Role of Heteronormativity in Shaping Climate for LGBTQ+ Engineering Undergraduates Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43667

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015