June 15, 2019
June 15, 2019
June 19, 2019
The planning phase of construction is relatively easy to implement in a classroom setting. Exercises that demonstrate and assess estimating and scheduling techniques are fairly common. Students can conduct material take-offs, labor productivity estimates, build network diagrams and Gantt charts, while using plans and specifications from real-world projects. The execution phase, however, is far more difficult to simulate. The classroom is constrained by time and space which prohibits students from actually executing, monitoring, and controlling their plan. CE450: Construction Management, taught in XXX, uses Project Imperium to provide students with a simulated construction experience in which they can plan, execute, monitor, and control a project. In Project Imperium, instead of using real plans and real materials, students employ K’NEX rods and connectors to build a structure, such as a two-story club house or a bridge. Material, labor and equipment prices and rates are provided to teams of four students who are responsible for placing a competitive bid (price and duration) for the project. With this information, teams develop a baseline from which they apply earned value analysis to monitor their performance. Teams are then expected to build the clubhouse or bridge within six “months” of construction—each month is 10 minutes long. During this time, students are monitoring progress using metrics which begin to shape decisions in future months. With the assistance of an Excel model, students can visually see trends in costs and schedule which help them make decisions to correct their trajectory. The model is composed of management “levers” the students can pull. The project manager can crash the project by authorizing overtime or adding additional workers. On the other hand, they can also cut costs by selecting cheaper labor and poor-quality material. Of course, there are inherent risks in these cost-cutting measures: too many “cheap” choices can lead to litigation from the owner. It is the repercussions of these decisions which Imperium and the model provides. Immediately, a student can see the outcome of a construction management choice. Cost-cutting decisions result in an increase in the “litigation potential” indicator on the student’s dashboard. Crashing choices results in a drop in projected profit, but also a potential to decrease total project duration. This visualization of cause and effect improves decision making skills.
Future construction managers should be able to monitor progress, assess data, and make an informed decision to control the outcome of a project. Many gain this skill from actual work experience; perhaps, it is possible to gain it in the classroom. Creating this management experience in the classroom ensures our students can immediately add value to the projects they’ll manage after they graduate.
Wambeke, B., & Mainwaring, T. (2019, June), Monitoring and Controlling a Construction Project in the Classroom Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33120
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015