June 14, 2009
June 14, 2009
June 17, 2009
14.893.1 - 14.893.19
Multidisciplinary Engineering– Flexibility and ABET Accreditation
An extremely flexible Multidisciplinary Engineering (MDE) program was developed that extensively uses existing courses taught by other engineering programs. The program has nine structured concentrations and also allows student-developed concentrations. In the latter concentration 50 % of the course credits required for graduation are electives or selectives. Students receive extensive pro-active advising to ensure their plans meet both graduation requirements and their educational objectives. The most popular concentration is currently acoustical engineering. An intensive and extensive assessment program that individually tracks the progress of each of the sixty students on the twelve program outcomes was developed. The MDE program was ultimately successful in obtaining ABET accreditation. The assessment procedures developed here provide a model for proving that all students including transfer students have met program outcomes. Based on analysis with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, male students in MDE are more likely to be intuitive, feeling and perceptive than male students in other engineering majors. These differences are statistically significant. Thus, development of flexible curricula that are attractive to and retain students that are less likely to stay in other engineering programs may be low-hanging fruit in reforming engineering education. Other universities could use the MDE program as a model of a very low cost, flexible program that helps retain engineering students and can meet ABET accreditation requirements.
Introduction: The Precursor to Multidisciplinary Engineering
The Multidisciplinary Engineering (MDE) program grew out of the Interdisciplinary Engineering Studies (IDES) program, which was founded in 1969 and has over 1600 alumni. IDES was established as a separate division in Engineering at a time when students were leaving engineering because of a general anti-technology and anti-government attitude in the USA. The goals of the IDES division were to help recruit and retain students who had the ability to do engineering but also had other compelling interests. To retain maximum flexibility the decision was made to not seek ABET accreditation and to require a minimum of 30 credits of engineering. Students were only allowed to follow plans of study that could not be done in one of the standard disciplines offered at the university.
By the early 21st century it was evident that IDES was serving two groups of students. One group of students wanted an engineering education but did not plan to pursue an engineering career. For example, these students were in preprofessional programs such as premedical engineering or prelaw engineering. The non-ABET accredited program was a good fit for these students. The other group of students was interested in pursuing an engineering career in programs such as acoustical engineering, biomedical engineering, and engineering management. Graduates who followed careers that did not require them to become registered professional engineers had few complaints about their educational preparation. On the other hand, graduates who wanted to become professional engineers often had considerable difficulty in being allowed to take the professional engineering examination because they had not graduated from an ABET accredited program. (Until 2006 IDES had a waiver from the Indiana State Board that allowed
Wankat, P., & Haghighi, K. (2009, June), Multidisciplinary Engineering: Flexibility And Abet Accreditation Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/4588
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015