June 15, 2014
June 15, 2014
June 18, 2014
Design in Engineering Education
24.948.1 - 24.948.12
On Engineering Design Education: Exposing Students to Design KnowledgeAbstract:Design is widely considered to be the central activity of engineering. Also, it is knownthat engineering programs should graduate engineers who can design effectively to meetsocial and environmental needs. Though the role and perception of design across a widerange of educational institutions have improved markedly in recent years; however, bothdesign faculty and design practitioners argue that further improvements are necessary.One of the defining characteristics of design is that there is rarely a single correct answerto an engineering problem but, rather, an optimal or acceptable solution leading to a finaldesign, presented as the best possible balance between technical as well as non-technicalconstraints. These non-technical constraints typically involve economics, politics, social& environmental issues, ethics, etc. And, while professional practitioners generallyaccept this understanding of design, students, by enlarge, tend to interpret the engineeringdesign process as an unambiguous and clearly defined process undergirded by rigidlyapplied principles and processes of “the scientific method.” Students’ vision and mis-concepts of design do require proper alignment with prevailing conditions on the ground.Undoubtedly, the start of any design course should be preceded by exposure to designthinking and related processes.This proposed paper begins first, by briefly reviewing the role of design in engineeringprograms. Second, it outlines the current research on how design thinking processescould be taught and learned. Third, it explores the currently most-favored pedagogicalmodel for teaching design, namely: Project-Based Learning (PBL). The paper identifiesseveral contexts for PBL, along with some available data on it success. Finally, the paperraises some of the questions that should be answered to identify the most effectivepedagogical practices of improving design learning. Understanding the design process as a discipline-specific argumentative discoursestrategy can help colleges improve engineering education with engineering graduates thatare more rhetorically aware engineers. Importantly, these possibilities align well withABET’s criteria for student learning outcomes.
Akili, W. (2014, June), On Engineering Design Education: Exposing Students to Design Knowledge Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--22881
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015