June 14, 2009
June 14, 2009
June 17, 2009
14.926.1 - 14.926.12
Online Engineering Technology Courses – the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
There has been increasing interest in developing web-based engineering and engineering technology courses and in converting traditional face-to-face college classes into online courses. The Manufacturing Engineering Technology BS Program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, strategically developed all core senior-level courses into a multi media infused online delivery mode over the past few years with flexible Face-2-Face labs or capstone course projects. With the assistance of state grant funding, this strategy was based on our industries’ call to retain students for a greater term for internship experiences and to benefit the student’s career competitiveness while still providing equal or superior learning in the engineering management based core courses of the program. The program is now debating whether to continue this form of delivery, add more online classes, or to return some or all of the classes to traditional face-to- face campus lectures and laboratories. Highlights include where expectations were exceeded, met, or fell short in online conversion from Face-2-Face traditional delivery and succession planning for new faculty or content driven changes.
In the process, we have developed a number of considerations and questions to help engineering and engineering technology programs decide whether a given class is a good candidate for online web-based delivery. We have also found that there are a number of factors, problems, and costs, often hidden, which must be considered when developing or converting online classes. This paper will present the questions and considerations which we are using to determine the value of placing each course online, and will discuss the advantages, factors, costs, and problems involved with implementing these online courses, based on our research and experience. Also included are twelve learned Best Practices for asynchronous online and a “Take Home Strategic Online Planning Sketch” to help foster other online learning models. Student learner feedback also included.
“It is not necessary to change, survival is not mandatory” W. Edwards Deming. It was in 2004 where the spirit of this quote coupled with broad university strategic support for innovative online course and program course conversion, that the department began the journey to meet the call for competitive change. With the Higher Learning Commission’s recent awarded accreditation approval for Minnesota State University, Mankato, to begin delivering online courses and programs, the Manufacturing Engineering Technology (MET) program of the Automotive and Manufacturing Department was in a good position to pursue attractive funding mechanisms. This was matched with a willing faculty and a department strategy to meet a need for more flexible delivery modes while maintaining effective pedagogue. Data from an earlier 1999 Noel- Levitz marketing study for the state university system documented student demand for technology and scheduling flexibility that teaching with technology allows including1:
Goebel, A., & Petersen, H., & Peterson, W. (2009, June), On Line Manufacturing Engineering Technology Courses: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly Paper presented at 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--5075
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2009 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015