New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
June 29, 2016
978-0-692-68565-5
2153-5965
Mathematics
6
10.18260/p.25863
https://peer.asee.org/25863
636
I am a doctoral candidate in mathematics education in the Ph.D. program at the Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, and I teach in the Department of Urban Education at Rutgers University-Newark.
Technologies developed for teaching and learning mathematics are powerful and potentially useful. One significant factor of successful integration of technology in mathematics classrooms is understanding how technology influences teachers and students’ social interactions and shapes their mathematical knowledge. Vygotsky (1978) emphasized the role of tools and signs for cognitive development. He argued that intellectual development occurs through engagement in tool-mediated activities that allow for social interactions. Some researchers used this perspective to explain the mediation of technological tools in mathematical. However, for mathematics teachers’ to use technological tools in their classrooms effectively, they need to learn how to use the tools. This creates a need for investigating how teachers learn to use mathematical tools and the mediations of these tools in teachers’ activities.
Several researchers theorized how technological tools mediate learners’ activity. For example, Rabardel and Beguin’s (2005) describe two mediation roles of tools in users’ activity: epistemic (focuses on understanding the properties of the object) and pragmatic (concerned with transferring the object to a desirable form). In this paper, we report on a third mediation role that teachers used while working on geometrical tasks in a collaborative dynamic geometry environment. We analyzed the interactions of four middle and high school teachers and identified the third mediation role of the environment.
The four mathematics teachers participated in a 15-week professional development course. They interacted in an online, collaborative, dynamic geometry environment called Virtual Math Teams with GeoGebra (VMTwG), which allows for synchronous interactions among users through a multiuser interface of GeoGebra and a chat feature. VMTwG records users’ actions in GeoGebra as well as their chat massages. The teachers met synchronously in VMTwG for two hours every week to work on open-ended geometrical problems. We analyzed teachers’ weekly sessions by reading their discussions and viewing their GeoGebra actions to understand how the environment mediated their activities. Our analysis of their interactions allowed us to categorize how VMTwG mediated teachers’ activities as they discussed and solved geometrical tasks. We were able to identify a pedagogic mediation, in which teachers concerned themselves with how to teach with this environment. They used it to teach each other and convey their ideas in a didactic manner as well as to discuss how VMTwG could be used to teach certain school topics. In these pedagogic meditative moments, the environment is used as a mediator not particularly to make transformations on the objects or explore objects’ properties and relations, but to help others understand these transformations, properties, and relations.
Pedagogic mediation adds to our understanding of how teachers interact with mathematical tools. It informs professional development design and implementation and informs task design in dynamic geometry environments for teachers and students.
References Rabardel, P., & Beguin, P. (2005). Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(5), 429-461. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Alqahtani, M. M., & Powell, A. B. (2016, June), Pedagogic Mediation of Dynamic Geometry in Teachers' Mathematical Activities Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25863
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015