Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia
March 28, 2025
March 28, 2025
March 29, 2025
8
10.18260/1-2--54681
https://peer.asee.org/54681
14
Our goal is to design an effects pedal that allows the musician/user to change and modify an input signal from an instrument, whether it is an electric guitar, bass, or other electronic instrument. Some pedals use an analog circuit, consisting of a variety of electronics to modify the signal, while other pedals use a digital approach to this utilizing a microprocessor that has been programmed to allow the signal to be modified digitally.
The objective of this project is to design a digital effects pedal that allows the user to alter the input signal from a guitar or bass. The device should be able to be switched on (causing an effect to the guitar signal) or switched off (passing the guitar signal unchanged) using a foot operated switch on the device, which is a commonplace among pedal designs, whether digital or analog. The device should be digital to reduce the impacts of noise and enable multiple effects to be more easily integrated into a single pedal, while being intuitive to the user, compared to those currently on the market.
While there are many guitar effects pedals on the market, most are specialized for either electric guitar or bass, often meaning that the unit has to have a large number of effect options to give options to both types of musicians. The goal of this project is to design an effects pedal that can accommodate both electric guitar and bass while being user friendly, intuitive, and focus only on the most popular effects. To understand what may be a good set of effects to select, an institutional review board (IRB) approved survey has been distributed to ONU students, faculty and staff and 48 results have been compiled to determine the most popular effects of overdrive, distortion, reverb, delay and modulation. As part of that survey we also inquired as to who would be willing to come back later in the year to help test those effects, to help ensure the quality and intuitiveness of the effects, as well as the enclosure design, meets a general musicians’ standard.
A few constraints that we found applicable to our project were things such as using a standard ¼ inch input and output jack, to match the standard sizing used by all pedals. Our dsp should be compatible with an evaluation board, to allow for easy testing, and flashing of code to the processor. Our design alternative, which was decided using a Pugh’s method table to evaluate alternatives chosen through functional decomposition, will utilize an enclosure designed to fit within standard pedal dimensions, and formed out of aluminum. This design also utilized a full circuit instead of the development board, but for testing purposes, and accessibility, the development board won out. The user interface is a display screen, with knobs to control the various parameters and cycle through the effect choices. The design of the printed circuit board (PCB) will ultimately be dependent upon what needs to be fit on it, with a prioritization of reducing noise.
Note: Authors: Wesley Hanson, Cody Beagle, Aaron Altstaetter, Amari Patterson
Hanson, W. C., & Beagle, C., & Altstaetter, A., & Patterson, A. S. (2025, March), PolarBear DSP Digital Effects Pedal Paper presented at 2025 ASEE North Central Section (NCS) Annual Conference, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia. 10.18260/1-2--54681
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015