Asee peer logo

Practical Design Considerations For Large Marine Structures In South Carolina

Download Paper |

Conference

2005 Annual Conference

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 12, 2005

Start Date

June 12, 2005

End Date

June 15, 2005

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Teaching Experiences in OME

Page Count

6

Page Numbers

10.1004.1 - 10.1004.6

DOI

10.18260/1-2--14540

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/14540

Download Count

545

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Robert Dullanty

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

Practical Design Considerations for Large Marine Structures in South Carolina

Robert E. Dullanty Sr., P.E. Principal Engineer Schneider & Associates, Inc.

Abstract Criterion 3 of ABET 2004-2005 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs requires that all engineering programs seeking accreditation manifest that their graduates have an ability to “function on multidisciplinary teams.” Students should be able to serve as both a team leader and a contributing member of a design team. This paper presents a case study of two heavy marine structures in the Charleston, South Carolina. Heavy marine structures typically involve large and unusual loads from cranes, ships, and cargo; generally are supported upon weak and sloped soils; and usually require significant design considerations for marine and coastal environments including corrosive conditions. Marine structures provide for excellent classroom case studies because they inherently require multidisciplinary evaluation and site specific engineering solutions.

Introduction This paper discusses practical design considerations for large marine structures in South Carolina. As examples, it uses two projects from the South Carolina State Ports Authority. The first project is the evaluation and upgrading of container crane rails at the North Charleston, SC, terminal, and the second project is the investigation and evaluation of an existing 1940’s era warehouse foundation for use as a new wharf foundation in Charleston, SC.

The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates six waterfront sites that handle containerized cargo, bulk cargo and break-bulk cargo. As a container port, Charleston generally ranks fourth in the U.S. in terms of containerized cargo volume. This is done through four terminal sites located in the Charleston, South Carolina area. The South Carolina State Ports Authority also operates two smaller bulk and break-bulk ports located in Port Royal, South Carolina and Georgetown, South Carolina.

Evaluation and Upgrade of Container Crane Rail Beams at the North Charleston Terminal The South Carolina State Ports Authority (Ports Authority) needed to upgrade container cranes at its facilities and decided to acquire new cranes and relocate several exiting cranes between their various Charleston area terminals. The North Charleston Terminal was slated to have some “middle aged” container cranes relocated to the terminal to replace the Ports Authority’s oldest container cranes. These new cranes were faster, reached farther, and of course, imparted higher loads onto the supporting wharf.

“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”

Dullanty, R. (2005, June), Practical Design Considerations For Large Marine Structures In South Carolina Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--14540

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015