Asee peer logo

Prediction and Reflection Activities in a Chemical Engineering Course: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer

Download Paper |


2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition


New Orleans, Louisiana

Publication Date

June 26, 2016

Start Date

June 26, 2016

End Date

June 29, 2016





Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Tagged Division

Chemical Engineering

Page Count




Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Heather C. S. Chenette Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

visit author page

Heather Chenette is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her professional interests include enhancing student learning in the classroom and creating opportunities for students to learn about membrane materials and bioseparation processes through research experiences.

visit author page

author page

Tony Ribera Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Download Paper |


This paper presents a quantitative and qualitative study for discovering how written reflective exercises following in-class prediction activities enhance learning gains in a heat and mass transfer course for chemical engineering undergraduate students. The primary purpose of this research is to determine if and how written reflection activities are successful at adjusting commonly-held misconceptions students have about heat and mass transfer. To study this, three 30-minute prediction activities are planned throughout a ten-week course. The study participants include three sections each with approximately 25 junior-level chemical engineering students. Based on their course section, students are broken into two groups. One group is asked to complete a follow-up reflection assignment after each prediction activity, guiding them through the reflective process, while the other group completes no structured follow-up reflection activity. The HECI concept inventory is administered to students of all sections at the start and the end of the course. The HECI along with other course assessments will be used to evaluate learning gains. Archived data from classes with no prediction activities and no reflection activities will serve as a control group. Correlations between quantitative assessment performance and student group (prediction activities and practicing reflection, prediction activities only, no prediction and no reflection) will be discussed. To explore if the quality of reflection is related to learning gains, student reflections will be ranked according to a validated rubric and compared with data on learning gains. Additionally, to further understand how students’ perception of learning is affected by these activities, a focus group of approximately 10 students will be organized and interviewed in a semi-structured format after the conclusion of the course. Key insights from the qualitative interviews will be discussed. The goal of this study is to direct the role of prediction and reflection activities in future courses.

Chenette, H. C. S., & Ribera, T. (2016, June), Prediction and Reflection Activities in a Chemical Engineering Course: Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27334

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015