June 23, 2013
June 23, 2013
June 26, 2013
Engineering Design Graphics
23.975.1 - 23.975.9
Preferential Learning of Students in a Post-Secondary IntroductoryEngineering Graphics Course: A Preliminary Study Focused on Students At- RiskThis study follows a thematic trend in research that gauges engineering graphics studentpreferences, abilities, and consequent approaches and curricular designs for instructors.Students’ backgrounds, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors are considered to directly affect learningin the classroom; therefore research is needed as to how students learn in the content that weteach. This study used the VARK Questionnaire to identify the preferred learning approaches ofstudents in an introductory engineering graphics class at a major university. The questionnaireindicates whether a person prefers one or multi-modal learning methods that include (V)visual,(A)aural, (R)read/write, and (K)kinesthetic. A demographic instrument was employed to gatherdata that assisted in classifying students as being at-risk of leaving college or not at-risk. Theresearchers used the Fisher exact test to analyze the collected data. The Fisher exact test is mostcommonly applied to evaluation of a hypothesis with data framed in a 2x2 contingency tablewhere chi-square assumptions are not individually met (Sheskin, 2007). The null hypotheses areevaluated based on the probability of determining a collection of “observed frequencies evenmore extreme” than the set summarized in the contingency tables (Sheskin, 2007 p.633).Students that took the VARK Questionnaire (n=132) had an overall high preference ofkinesthetic learning at 27.4% indicating this is how they prefer to learn, with visual (16.9%)being the least preferred learner preference. Forty-two of the participants were classified as at-risk and no significant difference was identified within each learner preference between at-riskand not at-risk groups. The findings from this preliminary study support previous researchconducted in engineering design graphics courses at the high school level (Ernst, 2011). A majorrecommendation is to fully incorporate differentiated instructional methods and applications topromote learning in engineering graphics at the post-secondary level, not solely virtual modelingwhen teaching students how to visualize technical information.
Ernst, J. V., & Clark, A. C. (2013, June), Preferential Learning of Students in a Post-Secondary Introductory Engineering Graphics Course: A Preliminary Study Focused on Students At-Risk Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--22360
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015