June 16, 2002
June 16, 2002
June 19, 2002
7.932.1 - 7.932.12
Preliminary Findings from Coding Student Design Journals
Durward K. Sobek, II Montana State University
Since Fall 2000, mechanical engineering students at Montana State University have been required to keep design journals of their senior design projects. We have now accumulated over 70 journals on 21 design projects. We developed a coding scheme to code the journal data by design activity (problem definition, idea generation, engineering analysis, and design refinement), design level (concept, system, detail), planning, and formal reporting. The scheme was then used to code approximately one-third of the journal data collected to date.
This paper will first describe the coding scheme and its development. It will then report some preliminary findings from the journal coding. Specifically, we will show that journal data can be used to produce time profiles of design activity over the course of the projects, estimates of the proportion of time spent in activity associated with the different codes, and comparisons of student processes to “good” design processes as documented in the literature. These findings should be of interest to design educators interested in assessing design processes. Finally, the paper will posit a number of hypotheses that arise from the data, for future consideration.
Design is one of the quintessential characteristics of the practicing engineer. It is perfectly appropriate, then, for it to hold a prominent position in engineering education—most engineering programs in this country culminate in a significant design project as the capstone of the degree program. Also, ABET places special emphasis on design in its accreditation evaluation criteria. 1
The activities that typically fall under the category “design” consist of analysis activities, that is, making some determination about an existing idea or solution, and synthesis activities— generating a new idea to address an identified problem. While a good deal of research has looked at design, and there is much we know about good design and good design processes, there is still much we do not understand about the synthesis process. Therefore, it seems if we want to help aspiring engineers become proficient designers, it behooves us to delve into the human synt hesis process, to really get at the basic fundamentals of what enables synthesis, what hinders it, and what tools and skills are requisite.
In 2000, I embarked on a project funded by the National Science Foundation to in part address some of these questions. The idea was to study the design processes students use in their senior Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education
Sobek, D. (2002, June), Preliminary Findings From Coding Student Design Journals Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2--10566
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2002 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015