Asee peer logo

“Professional” Acts: Analyzing Sites of Identity and Interactive Response in Chemical Engineering Students

Download Paper |

Conference

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Indianapolis, Indiana

Publication Date

June 15, 2014

Start Date

June 15, 2014

End Date

June 18, 2014

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Engineering Student Experiences

Tagged Division

Educational Research and Methods

Page Count

17

Page Numbers

24.1411.1 - 24.1411.17

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/19901

Download Count

39

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Deborah Tihanyi University of Toronto

visit author page

Deborah Tihanyi is a Senior Lecturer in the Engineering Communication Program.

visit author page

author page

Penny Kinnear University of Toronto

Download Paper |

Abstract

“Professional” Acts: Analyzing sites of identity and interactive response in chemical engineering studentsProfessionalism has been designated as an outcome by ABET and CEAB. It has become analmost standard part of most rubrics used to evaluate student performance, however, it does notseem to be as salient in curricula and pedagogy. In the specific Engineering Communicationprogram, students were required to put together a portfolio, including reflections on what theportfolio selections showed about the students. Because these portfolios were assembled over a2-year period and included a combination of assigned course work, evidence of interactions anditerations of the reflections it was possible to see a transformation from chemical engineeringstudent to nascent chemical engineer. Using a longitudinal research method we felt it would bepossible to identify specific activities and practices that might contribute to a more principledway of integrating professionalism into curricula and pedagogy.The study, begun in September 2012, follows a cohort of 11 chemical engineering students fromtheir first year as chemical engineering students until one year after graduation. The 11 chemicalengineering students form the core of the participants. Additional participants include the faculty,professors and teaching assistants, involved in selected courses. Courses included in the studywere chosen based on preliminary research (interviews and document analysis) that identifiedcertain courses as pivotal to the transition from student to professional. Data includes individualinterviews, discussion groups, written and oral, individual and team assignments, rubrics,feedback, language logs and participant observation.The study is theoretically grounded in Activity theory because AT allows us to examine therelationships among the various data at both macro and micro levels. Data analysis is proceedingas a continuous review cycle where we identify and define emergent themes and categories. Wehave identified three types of categories in our data thus far. The first are the sites of learning, thesecond the tools and mediational means that facilitate that learning and the third is affect. Forthis paper we have chosen to focus on two of the key sites, Identity and Interactive Response.We define Identity as the affiliations and values either claimed or ascribed to an individual andthe actions or behaviours of the individual in diverse contexts. Interactive Response refers to theresponses (physical, written or oral) to the individuals’ attempts at “professional” acts. Theseresponses may take the form of formative or summative evaluations, assessment and informalresponses from peers, family, friends and “clients”.In this paper, we will present our initial findings on the sites of Identity and InteractiveResponse, which will allow us to showcase early “professional” acts among our participants, theresponses to them, and the ways in which they evolved over the first year of the study period. Wewill also present the potential implications of these findings for application in pedagogy andcurriculum.

Tihanyi, D., & Kinnear, P. (2014, June), “Professional” Acts: Analyzing Sites of Identity and Interactive Response in Chemical Engineering Students Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/19901

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2014 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015