Ray, V. M., & White, J. W., & Koo, D. D. (2014, June), Program Accreditation: Developing a Methodology to Retrieve and Maintain Relevant Data for Course Improvement and Provide an Assessment Process Which Closes the Loop  Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--22943

\bibitem{asee_peer_22943}
  Ray, V. M., \& White, J. W., \& Koo, D. D. (2014, June), \emph{Program Accreditation: Developing a Methodology to Retrieve and Maintain Relevant Data for Course Improvement and Provide an Assessment Process Which Closes the Loop}
  Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  10.18260/1-2--22943

Veto Matthew Ray, J. William White, and Dan D. Koo.  "Program Accreditation: Developing a Methodology to Retrieve and Maintain Relevant Data for Course Improvement and Provide an Assessment Process Which Closes the Loop".  2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2014.  https://peer.asee.org/22943 Internet.  15 Dec, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_22943}
  Veto Matthew Ray, J. William White, and Dan D. Koo.
  "Program Accreditation: Developing a Methodology to Retrieve and Maintain Relevant Data for Course Improvement and Provide an Assessment Process Which Closes the Loop".
  \emph{2014 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2014.
  https://peer.asee.org/22943 Internet.  15 Dec, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_22943
author = "Veto Matthew Ray, J. William White, and Dan D. Koo"
title = "Program Accreditation: Developing a Methodology to Retrieve and Maintain Relevant Data for Course Improvement and Provide an Assessment Process Which Closes the Loop"
booktitle = "2014 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition"
year = "2014"
month = "June"
address = "Indianapolis, Indiana"
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/22943}
number = {10.18260/1-2--22943}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  -          Program Accreditation: Developing a Methodology to Retrieve           and Maintain Relevant Data for Course Improvement and            Provide an Assessment Process Which Closes the LoopThe focus of this endeavor was to define a cyclical process of meaningful data collection forcourse evaluation and timely review. By clearly defining methods and purpose, faculty andoverall programs would improve their ability to track pitfalls, reduce the time spent gatheringambiguous information and increase opportunity for course improvement. The primary target ofthis evaluation was to retrieve and maintain relevant data and show proof of an assessmentprocess to meet the requirements for ABET accreditation as well as NCA (North CentralAccreditation). As higher education evolves and competition increases for funding it isimperative that academic departments and programs strive for excellence. By improving datacollection for course evaluation and maintaining accreditation, the department increases itsability to attract students, influence the procurement of research dollars and reduce counter-productive efforts gathering information that has no useful application. Both research dollarsand financial aid are dependent upon the ability to earn or maintain accreditation. In 2011research dollars for the school exceeded 9 million dollars and statistics from 2010 revealed that69% of all students enrolled at the school received some form of need-based financial assistance.The Department of Engineering Technology utilized Six Sigma tools and strategies including SixSigma DMADV methodology (define, measure, analyze, design and verify) for the basis of its“Program Enrichment” process. The project team included: the department chair, administrativesupport, program directors, and selected faculty members. Through interviews with keystakeholders, surveys, historical data and existing components, the team was able to define a new“closed-loop process” with identifiable review stages to ensure compliance as well as a datacollection plan. The new process has been rolled out as a pilot program among full time facultymembers with the expectation to expand the program to encompass all instructors within thedepartment. This paper will demonstrate the use of Six Sigma tools as a means of enhancing anexisting assessment process or creating a new process for evaluating and improving programcourses along with providing proof of an assessment process necessary to earn or maintainprogram accreditation.
AU  - Veto Matthew Ray
AU  - J. William White
AU  - Dan D. Koo
CY  - Indianapolis, Indiana
DA  - 2014/06/15
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - Program Accreditation: Developing a Methodology to Retrieve and Maintain Relevant Data for Course Improvement and Provide an Assessment Process Which Closes the Loop
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/22943
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--22943
ER  -