Seattle, Washington
June 28, 1998
June 28, 1998
July 1, 1998
2153-5965
4
3.463.1 - 3.463.4
10.18260/1-2--7365
https://peer.asee.org/7365
349
Session 2230
Programmed Instruction - Engineered Instruction Re-Visited
Wallace Venable West Virginia University
Abstract Programmed Instruction (PI) was one of a number of technologies derived from Behaviorism during the 1960’s. This paper outlines the elements of PI and summarizes its effective use at West Virginia University.
Behaviorism as a Technology
As teachers, our job is to deliver skills and knowledge to our customers. No psychological concept provides more powerful tools to accomplish this task than Behaviorism, a product of the Twentieth Century.
It is the basis of two powerful and related methods, Programmed Instruction (PI) and Behavior Modification (Behavior Mod). At heart, both methods rely on four simple principals: 1. Know what you want to accomplish. 2. Place your subjects in an appropriate environment. 3. Keep your eye on your subjects' behavior. 4. Reward appropriate behavior. In reality, there was little new in the way of principles introduced. The contribution was in their rigorous and focused application. It can be said that they represent the application of the engineering design process to education and training.
As a general philosophy, strict Behaviorism has been subjected to severe criticism because some of its leading proponents insisted that all learning is controlled strictly by conditioning. This has serious religious and/or philosophical implications in arguments about concepts such as “thinking” and “free will.” This paper is concerned with it only as a foundation for a technology. It is presented here as a set of heuristics for the design of instruction.
Behavior Modification, also called operant conditioning, is still popular. It is particularly widely used in animal training. It is easily visualized as a method of correcting children, but it equally applicable to adults. One of the author's teachers, Julie Skinner Vargas, even required each of her students to conduct an experiment in using it to change their own behavior.
Fred Keller's invention, PSI, the “Proctorial System of Instruction” or “Personalized System of Instruction” was based on similar principles. It was, however, constructed as a practical solution
1
Venable, W. (1998, June), Programmed Instruction Engineered Instruction Re Visited Paper presented at 1998 Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/1-2--7365
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 1998 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015