Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
June 22, 2008
June 22, 2008
June 25, 2008
2153-5965
Mechanical Engineering
16
13.1011.1 - 13.1011.16
10.18260/1-2--4296
https://peer.asee.org/4296
405
Gregory W. Davis, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University, formerly known as GMI Engineering & Management Institute. Acting in this capacity, he teaches courses in the Automotive and Thermal Science disciplines. He also serves a Director of the Advanced Engine Research Laboratory, where he conducts research in alternative fuels and engines. Greg is active on the professional level of SAE, currently serving as a Director on the SAE Board of Directors (term, 2007-2010), a Director on the Publications Board, and Past-Chair of the Engineering Education Board. He is also active in numerous committees.
Craig J. Hoff, Ph.D., P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University. He teaches thermal science and automotive engineering. His research interests include fuel cell and hybrid electric vehicles. Dr. Hoff is also the faculty advisor to the Kettering Formula SAE racecar team.
Promoting Professional Development in Undergraduate Engineering Using Laboratory Team Projects: A Case Study Good professional communication skills and the ability to work in teams are critical skills demanded by engineering companies. Further, in order to maintain competitiveness and to work in the global marketplace, engineering companies are increasingly supporting the creation and use of professional standards that are developed by engineering societies. Unfortunately, many undergraduates have historically received little or no education regarding this aspect of engineering.
This paper describes the efforts to provide students with laboratory-based projects which provide students with significant exposure to professional engineering standards and practices. These projects require the students to read professional standards that pertain to the particular topic under study and to operate vehicles while using professional automotive engineering tools.
Introduction
Many undergraduates are largely unaware of the resources available at professional engineering societies. These resources range from professional codes and recommended practices to technical papers, and professional contacts. These resources can help young engineers to get a “jump start” on their peers.
Because of the need to cover many fundamental engineering topics in core courses, it is difficult to set aside sufficient time for hands-on, professional work. Often experimental work is concentrated into specific laboratory courses where students tend to be given detailed, step-by- step instructions on how to use the lab equipment and calculate the results. This approach is not the best way to prepare the students for the reality of professional engineering practice.
It can be difficult for faculty to devote time in providing exceptional design and applied experiences to undergraduates while also trying to develop their research. Often faculty members find that these priorities compete for their time. This is particularly difficult for young faculty. Further, young faculty members increasingly have extremely limited work experience in the engineering profession. This has led to a gap between what universities are teaching, and what engineers are expected to know in industry.1 Engineers in industry spend much time working on complex system integration, yet few engineering undergraduates understand this process.2 Bokulich [2] adds “the state of education in this country, especially in science, engineering and technology, has become a matter of increasing concern to many of us in American industry.”
At the graduate level, industry and universities actively collaborate in research and development programs. This results in a supply of highly qualified technical specialists which industry uses to continue the process of development. This collaboration is not typical at the undergraduate level, and industry simply “accepts the ‘output’ from university with the knowledge that they have to complete the training process through in-house training programs.”3 In an increasing competitive global economy, this practice is not sustainable.
Davis, G., & Hoff, C. (2008, June), Promoting Professional Development In Undergraduate Engineering Using Laboratory Team Projects: A Case Study Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 10.18260/1-2--4296
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015