Asee peer logo

Publishing Behavior of Engineering Faculty

Download Paper |


2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access


Virtual On line

Publication Date

June 22, 2020

Start Date

June 22, 2020

End Date

June 26, 2021

Conference Session

Opening Up: Data, Open Access, and Open Educational Resources

Tagged Division

Engineering Libraries

Page Count




Permanent URL

Download Count


Request a correction

Paper Authors


Chelsea Leachman Washington State University

visit author page

Chelsea Leachman is the engineering librarian at Washington State University. She obtained here Masters of Library and Information Science from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee in 2011. She has a background in science and engineering. She received her Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science with a minor in geology from the University of Idaho 2007.

visit author page


Talea Anderson Washington State University

visit author page

Talea Anderson works as Scholarly Communication Librarian in the Center for Digital Scholarship and Curation at Washington State University.

visit author page

Download Paper |


At a rural land-grant university, the engineering librarian and scholarly communications librarian have been working to understand the complex relation between open access publishing and faculty expectations. When exploring this idea, the librarians found that promotion, rank, and tenure (PRT) guidelines have long been identified as a crucial factor in the perpetuation of particular publishing practices (Ellis, 2019; Hilstob, 2017; Odell, Coates, & Palmer, 2016; Wical & Kocken, 2017). Although librarians and open-access advocates have frequently discussed PRT as a barrier to open access, engineering faculty have rarely been approached as a group to glean their views on opportunities and challenges involved in changing these guidelines. To meet the need for a better understanding of engineering faculty’s publishing process, the first goal of this study was to collect responses from engineering faculty at a land-grant university about the role of promotion, rank and tenure (PRT) guidelines as they relate to individual publication practices. The second goal of the study was to take a holistic approach and examine engineering faculty’s overall criteria during the publication selection process as it relates to formal and informal publishing. The librarians acknowledge that faculty take into account more than one set of guidelines when choosing where to publish; therefore, by exploring PRT in tandem with other criteria for selecting publications, the authors expect to gain a deeper understanding of current publishing practices within engineering. Using this deeper understanding, the engineering librarian and scholarly communications librarian plan to educate departments, colleges, and the university leadership to work towards a more open and equitable scholarly landscape. While some larger institutions have spoken out about these issues in statements such as the Big Ten’s “Sustaining Values and Scholarship,” this project will focus on the perspectives of specific faculty at a public land-grant institution and will, thus, contribute to an understanding of the issues at play and possibilities for future advancement in PRT guidelines.

Leachman, C., & Anderson, T. (2020, June), Publishing Behavior of Engineering Faculty Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35110

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015