Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS) Technical Session _ Monday June 26, 1:30 - 3:00
Engineering Ethics Division (ETHICS)
Diversity
18
10.18260/1-2--43997
https://peer.asee.org/43997
278
Dr. Justin L Hess is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Hess’s research focuses on empathic and ethical formation in engineering education. He received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education, as well as a Master of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering. He is the editorial board chair for the Online Ethics Center, deputy director for research for the National Institute of Engineering Ethics, and past-division chair for the ASEE Liberal Education/Engineering and Society division.
Matthew James is an Associate Professor of Practice in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Virginia. He holds bachelors and masters degrees from Virginia Tech in Civil Engineering.
Andrew Katz is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He leads the Improving Decisions in Engineering Education Agents and Systems (IDEEAS) Lab, a group that uses multi-modal data to characterize, understand, a
Recent headlines have featured large language models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, for their potential impacts throughout society. These headlines often focus on educational impacts and policies. We posit that LLMs have the potential to improve instructional approaches in engineering education. Thus, we argue that as an engineering education community, we should aim to leverage LLMs to help resolve challenges in engineering education. This study takes up one aspect of instructional design: valid assessment of students' learning outcomes in engineering ethics. In this study, we present a method for engineering educators to implement NLP in open-ended ethics assessments (here, written responses to an ethics case scenario). Grading such open-ended responses has challenges: it requires a non-trivial time commitment and attention to consistency. To mitigate these challenges, we developed an NLP approach based on open-source, transformer-based LLMs. We applied and evaluated our NLP approach for coding students' responses to an open-ended ethics case scenario in a first-year engineering course. The results showed that our NLP approach labeled 380 out of 472 sentences accurately. Conversely, only 8% (37 out of 472 responses) were inaccurately labeled. Overall, our NLP approach provides a step toward analyzing written responses to scenario-based assessments in a scalable manner. However, it is not perfect. One current downside of our NLP approach is that it requires a large upfront time investment in setting up the system. Our future work aims to lower that barrier to entry, thereby making it more accessible to a larger group of potential users.
Shakir, U., & Hess, J. L., & James, M., & Katz, A. (2023, June), Pushing Ethics Assessment Forward in Engineering: NLP-Assisted Qualitative Coding of Student Responses Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43997
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015