Virtual On line
June 22, 2020
June 22, 2020
June 26, 2021
At our university, most assistant professors are expected to develop and deliver a new senior/graduate-level elective course related to their research. We present here a collaboration between a non-tenure-track, teaching-focused associate professor and a new tenure-track assistant professor to design a course using principles from the literature. With the goal to generate new learning experiences at the graduate elective level, a course on “Vaccines and Immunoengineering” was developed via principles of backwards design, significant learning experiences, and team-based learning. In the months leading up to the delivery of the course, we met regularly to review educational literature and implement findings in the development of the rubric, topic outline, and class activities.
To design the structure of the course, first a list of course learning goals was developed. Bloom’s taxonomy in the cognitive domain was used as the primary guideline to ensure that different levels of learning were incorporated and that learning goals were measurable. Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning was used to add additional goals in the affective domain. This systematic course design approach was found by the new assistant professor to be not only straightforward, but empowered her to design a course focused on integrating significant learning experience a priori, rather than as an afterthought (an extra burden).
Approximately two months before the course began, the professors discovered that the course was overenrolled due to an error in our university’s scheduling system. To compensate for the fact that nearly 40 students (roughly half the size of the entire senior undergraduate class) were registered for the first offering of this elective, with no graduate teaching assistant support, principles of team-based learning were applied. The major projects of the course were completed in groups, but to hold individuals accountable, every student wrote a weekly reflection on their personal progress and learning. At the end of the semester, in lieu of a final exam, each student submitted a 10-15 page learning portfolio in which they wrote a narrative and included curated examples of the work they completed during the term. Each assessed element of the course was directly mapped to one of the course learning goals explicitly on the syllabus.
In this paper, we provide key assignment and assessment documentation associated with the course and discuss how these elements connect to the literature on education. In next offering of the course, the pace of the course will be adjusted and more guidance will be provided on reading assignments.
Enszer, J. A., & Fromen, C. A. (2020, June), Putting Course Design Principles to Practice: Creation of an Elective on Vaccines and Immunoengineering Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35112
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2020 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015