Putting Individual Learning Responsibility Back into the Team Experience – An Application of the Design Experience

Cecelia M. Wigal

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Baltimore , Maryland
Publication Date: June 25, 2023
Start Date: June 25, 2023
End Date: June 28, 2023
Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 8
Tagged Division: Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
Page Count: 16
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--43998
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/43998
Download Count: 112

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Cecelia M. Wigal University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

visit author page

Cecelia M. Wigal is a Professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. She received her Ph.D. from Northwestern University (1998), MSEE from Illinois Institute of Technology (1991), and BSEE from Ohio Northern University (1985). Dr. Wigal teaches interdisciplinary design and controls courses. Her primary engagement activity is improving the lives of those with physical and mental disabilities. Her primary areas of research include complex system analysis and quality process analysis with respect to nontraditional applications such as service systems. Dr. Wigal is also interested in engineering education reform to address present and future student and national and international needs. Dr. Wigal is a member of ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) where she has served in various officer positions for the Southeast Section including President, INFORMS (Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences), and AAUW (American Association of University Women). Dr. Wigal is an ABET Program Evaluator for General Engineering.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

This complete evidence-based practice paper addresses one means to increase the responsibility, and thus learning, of individual team members when completing a team-based project.

For years engineering programs have focused on the importance of students participating in team experiences within the subject and capstone classes. This team experience need was emphasized by ABET in its Criteria 3 – Student Outcomes, specifically outcome d (for years 2000 to 2019) and outcome 5 (for years 2019 to present) and emphatically adopted by most engineering programs. The need for teamwork is also emphasized by industry. However, some faculty have found that, due to this large emphasis on completing team-based projects, individual student project experiences have decreased. In addition, faculty have observed that much of the technical work on student team-based projects is completed by a subset of the team members. This results in the possibility that some students are completing courses without practicing or illustrating competence in a technical area.

Since the mid-2000s freshman level engineering students at the University of XXX have participated in a course that introduces them to the engineering design process, customer interaction, technical communication, and project management. The course evolved over time but has always required a customer-supported service-based team project as its culminating experience. Presently the course provides each team of 4 to 6 students a customer for which they develop a deliverable physical device that aids the customer or users, who may have one or more disabilities, to be independent in their life and/or learning. Student teams are multidisciplinary. They consist of mechanical and computer engineering, mechatronics technology, and environmental science students. During the culminating project students work through the engineering design process of identifying the project, understanding the project needs and criteria, developing conceptual designs, analyzing and testing design appropriateness and capabilities, determining final solution, building and testing solution, and delivering solution. Prior to Fall 2020, student teams, through a guided process, determined among themselves how they would work within their teams to meet the goal of producing and delivering the final product. Since Fall 2020, however, individual team members are now required to prototype and test functional concepts of the possible final design prior to final build. This is done to ensure that each student participates in the prototyping and testing phases of the design process. The goals are that each student will experience the learning that comes from hands on testing and each team will ensure testing of concepts prior to solidifying final designs.

As part of this process each team member is required to report – in memorandum format and in an oral presentation – their prototype design, device, test procedure, and test results. They submit their work to the instructor and share their results with their team members. At the end of the semester the students reflect, using an online survey, on the role the individual prototyping and testing experience played in their (1) contribution to the team, (2) learning of technical matter, and (3) confidence in working a design project in the future. This paper reports on the student responses to the reflection. In addition, it reports on the evaluation by the instructor, using the individual memorandums and team final reports, of the ability of each team member to (1) complete an effective prototype build and test and (2) to contribute to the final product design.

Citation
Format

Wigal, C. M. (2023, June), Putting Individual Learning Responsibility Back into the Team Experience – An Application of the Design Experience Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43998

TY - CPAPER
AB - This complete evidence-based practice paper addresses one means to increase the responsibility, and thus learning, of individual team members when completing a team-based project.

For years engineering programs have focused on the importance of students participating in team experiences within the subject and capstone classes. This team experience need was emphasized by ABET in its Criteria 3 – Student Outcomes, specifically outcome d (for years 2000 to 2019) and outcome 5 (for years 2019 to present) and emphatically adopted by most engineering programs. The need for teamwork is also emphasized by industry. However, some faculty have found that, due to this large emphasis on completing team-based projects, individual student project experiences have decreased. In addition, faculty have observed that much of the technical work on student team-based projects is completed by a subset of the team members. This results in the possibility that some students are completing courses without practicing or illustrating competence in a technical area.

Since the mid-2000s freshman level engineering students at the University of XXX have participated in a course that introduces them to the engineering design process, customer interaction, technical communication, and project management. The course evolved over time but has always required a customer-supported service-based team project as its culminating experience. Presently the course provides each team of 4 to 6 students a customer for which they develop a deliverable physical device that aids the customer or users, who may have one or more disabilities, to be independent in their life and/or learning. Student teams are multidisciplinary. They consist of mechanical and computer engineering, mechatronics technology, and environmental science students.
During the culminating project students work through the engineering design process of identifying the project, understanding the project needs and criteria, developing conceptual designs, analyzing and testing design appropriateness and capabilities, determining final solution, building and testing solution, and delivering solution. Prior to Fall 2020, student teams, through a guided process, determined among themselves how they would work within their teams to meet the goal of producing and delivering the final product. Since Fall 2020, however, individual team members are now required to prototype and test functional concepts of the possible final design prior to final build. This is done to ensure that each student participates in the prototyping and testing phases of the design process. The goals are that each student will experience the learning that comes from hands on testing and each team will ensure testing of concepts prior to solidifying final designs.

As part of this process each team member is required to report – in memorandum format and in an oral presentation – their prototype design, device, test procedure, and test results. They submit their work to the instructor and share their results with their team members. At the end of the semester the students reflect, using an online survey, on the role the individual prototyping and testing experience played in their (1) contribution to the team, (2) learning of technical matter, and (3) confidence in working a design project in the future.
This paper reports on the student responses to the reflection. In addition, it reports on the evaluation by the instructor, using the individual memorandums and team final reports, of the ability of each team member to (1) complete an effective prototype build and test and (2) to contribute to the final product design.

AU - Cecelia M. Wigal
CY - Baltimore , Maryland
DA - 2023/06/25
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Putting Individual Learning Responsibility Back into the Team Experience – An Application of the Design Experience
UR - https://peer.asee.org/43998
DO - 10.18260/1-2--43998
ER -