New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
June 29, 2016
978-0-692-68565-5
2153-5965
Design in Engineering Education
13
10.18260/p.26023
https://peer.asee.org/26023
3181
Craig Forest is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech where he also holds program faculty positions in Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering. He is a Fellow at the Allen Brain Institute in Seattle WA and he is one of the inaugural recipients of the NIH BRAIN Initiative Grants, a national research effort to invent the next generation of neuroscience and neuroengineering tools. He is cofounder/organizer of one of the largest undergraduate invention competitions in the US—The InVenture Prize, and founder/organizer of one of the largest student-run prototyping facilities in the US—The Invention Studio. He was named Engineer of the Year in Education for the state of Georgia (2013).
Helena Hashemi Farzaneh is a researcher at the Institute of Product Development at the Technical University of Munich. She works in the field of bio-inspired design and creativity and has been teaching courses for TRIZ (inventive problem solving) and bio-inspired design.
Technical universities around the world are opening makerspaces on their campuses: facilities and cultures that afford unstructured student-centric environments for design, invention, and prototyping. Consequentially, there is a growing need to survey and understand emergent trends and best practices, to compare and contrast them. Towards this end, we have conducted 38 interviews at five university maker spaces: Stanford University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Georgia Tech, Technical University of Berlin, and at Arizona State University. The comparison of these spaces highlights similarities and differences in the areas’ foci, size, accessibility, intellectual property policies, funding and staffing of the surveyed spaces. We extracted quantitative relations between maker space size and number of users, staff supervision composition and staff to user ratio.
While larger makerspaces affect a great portion of the student population, smaller spaces appear to focus more on a specific user group, such as entrepreneurs, student clubs or tinkerers. Amongst the five surveyed, makerspaces focused only on education might limit access to students, while other makerspaces open their doors to a larger group of stakeholders, such as alumni, entrepreneurs or even the general public. Most of these makerspaces have single foci, either education, community, or entrepreneurship, with some emerging models of multiple foci.
Total staffing hours per makerspace range from 20/week to 480/week, or on a per use basis 0.27-0.56 hours/supervised user. Accessibility and funding vary widely and should be evaluated based on goals and environment. Space varied from 0.5-1.7 monthly users/m². Equipment seems not to be as important as motivating and empowering members of the university community to build a culture.
While the sample size is small, does not span the spectrum of university makerspaces, and does not address crucial cultural factors, this survey and analysis provides an initial dataset and metrics for large, research-oriented institutions.
Forest, C., & Hashemi Farzaneh, H., & Weinmann, J., & Lindemann, U. (2016, June), Quantitative Survey and Analysis of Five Maker Spaces at Large, Research-Oriented Universities Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26023
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015