Asee peer logo

Remote Versus In-Class Active Learning Exercises for an Undergraduate Course in Fluid Mechanics

Download Paper |

Conference

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Location

Virtual Conference

Publication Date

July 26, 2021

Start Date

July 26, 2021

End Date

July 19, 2022

Conference Session

Thermal Fluid Experiment Related

Tagged Division

Mechanical Engineering

Page Count

15

DOI

10.18260/1-2--37661

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/37661

Download Count

314

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

John Michael Cotter University of South Florida

visit author page

John M. Cotter is a Philosophical Doctorate candidate at the University of South Florida. He began his career by attaining a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of Central Florida. He continued his career through employment as an engineer at Freeport-McMoRan, a copper mining company. Through his employment at Freeport, he attained roles of gradually increasing importance, starting as Mechanical Engineering Intern and finishing as a Mechanical Engineer II, in which he was employed as a maintenance supervisor. Through his career at Freeport, he developed a deep interest in teaching employees as much of the work is highly technical and safety sensitive. This applied as his maintenance employees worked on equipment that operated in a continuous fashion, meaning downtime absolutely had to be kept to a minimum. He left Freeport to seek his Philosophical Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering, in which training and learning are deeply involved. He is currently involved in teaching students as a Graduate Teaching Assistant, in which he provides feedback virtually to students during the COVID19 pandemic. He has a deep interest to develop his education skills in order to apply them to teaching employees as he seeks to begin a startup in the next three years.

visit author page

biography

Rasim Guldiken University of South Florida

visit author page

Dr. Rasim Guldiken is an Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director of the Mechanical Engineering Department at USF. His educational education interests lie in open courseware for courses in fluid mechanics, metacognitive activities, and flipped learning. Since joining USF in 2008, he has taught Fluid Mechanics and differential equation courses to 2100+ students and was invited to attend the ASEE National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI). He has been recognized internationally for his teaching efforts with awards such as 2021 USF STEM STEER Scholar, 2020 USF College of Engineering Outstanding Undergraduate Teaching Award, 2019 USF University-Wide Outstanding Undergraduate Teaching Award (the only awardee from the College of Engineering), 2018 USF University-Wide Outstanding Graduate Faculty Mentor, Honorable Mention (the only awardee from the College of Engineering) and national 2014 Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Ralph Teetor Educational Award.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

Fluid Mechanics is a fundamental core course in mechanical engineering curricula that covers the motion of fluids (liquids and gases), internal flows (flows in pipes/ducts), external flows (flow around vehicles and aircraft, river flow, etc.), and flow vector fields which require higher-order math skills to master. We have taught the undergraduate fluid mechanics course in hybrid modality with active in-class learning before the COVID-19 pandemic. Once the COVID-19 pandemic required the instruction to move to the remote format in the middle of the Spring2020 semester, we have started a new open Courseware website and a new YouTube channel and hosted 200+ lecture videos totaling 45 hours of undergraduate fluid mechanics class and prerequisite differential equations content and continued the active learning exercises via synchronous remote sessions. This paper discusses how the transition was accomplished and how the synchronous remote sessions were handled for continued active learning exercises for 100+ students enrolled in the class in spring 2020 and beyond. We also distributed a survey on students and inquired about how the student perception and learning effectiveness of active remote learning exercises vs. active in-class exercises. The students overall appreciated the availability of lecture videos and preferred to watch the lecture videos directly from YouTube as opposed to the Learning Management system. The majority of students found the effort to be more for remote instruction, as they found more responsibility has been placed on them. As a result, around 80% of students either preferred in-class active learning or were not sure for the Spring2020 semester. The percentage of students preferring online instruction increased for the Summer 2020 and Fall2020 semesters. As an example, just slightly over 50 percent of the students preferred in-class instruction as of the Fall2020 semester.

Cotter, J. M., & Guldiken, R. (2021, July), Remote Versus In-Class Active Learning Exercises for an Undergraduate Course in Fluid Mechanics Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--37661

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015