Asee peer logo

Research Data Sharing in Engineering: A Report on Faculty Practices and Preferences Prior to the Tri-Agency Policy

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 2: Understanding Our Users

Tagged Division

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Page Count

28

DOI

10.18260/1-2--44112

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/44112

Download Count

133

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Sarah Parker University of British Columbia, Vancouver

visit author page

Sarah Parker is an engineering librarian at the University of British Columbia where she also received her MLIS in 2014. She regularly promotes and contributes to open scholarship activities at UBC and incorporates her interest in open science and using open resources into her teaching. In addition to her liaison role, she aids in graduate student programming for UBC's Research Commons and co-teaches the Science and Technology Information Sources and Services course at the School of Information in the Faculty of Arts.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

The Tri-Agencies Council of Canada that includes the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) is implementing its Research Data Management (RDM) Policy in the Spring of 2023 [1]. The policy requires Canadian post-secondary institutions to develop an Institutional RDM Strategy to support and guide researchers funded by one or more of the Tri-Agencies. Researchers will be required to provide a Data Management Plan (DMP) and deposit their research data into a repository at the time of publication in order to fulfill funding obligations. This paper describes the survey results conducted at a U15 research institution in Canada asking engineering faculty about their research data sharing practices and preferences. The purpose of the survey was to answer the following questions: 1. How well prepared are engineering researchers for data deposit, 2. Are engineering researchers willing to share their data, and 3. What barriers exist for sharing engineering data? Results demonstrate knowledge of and acceptance of open access (OA) practices but when it comes to data, engineering researchers are more reluctant to share their data widely and may need guidance on RDM best practices. Subject librarians can prepare to provide assistance to faculty and educate students by gaining an understanding of engineering data management and sharing behaviors. Faculty may benefit from RDM support through all stages of the data life cycle and students may benefit from RDM literacy introduced into their curriculum. The described survey results in this paper aim to help the subject librarian identify where they might best offer support for faculty and students.

[1] Government of Canada, “Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy,” Mar. 15, 2021. https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/interagency-research-funding/policies-and-guidelines/research-data-management/tri-agency-research-data-management-policy (accessed Oct. 28, 2022).

Parker, S. (2023, June), Research Data Sharing in Engineering: A Report on Faculty Practices and Preferences Prior to the Tri-Agency Policy Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44112

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015