Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Engineering Economy Division (EED)
14
10.18260/1-2--44120
https://peer.asee.org/44120
176
Dr. Ming Li is an assistant professor at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China. He received his PhD in Administration at the Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics. From March 2013 to June 2013, he visited the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University as a visiting scholar. He ever worked as a post-doctor at the Institute of Education, Tsinghua University from 2016 to 2018. His research interests mainly focus on higher education administration, comparative higher education and higher engineering education.
Miss. Min Zhao is a postgraduate student who is majoring in the Curriculum and Instruction at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China. Her research interests mainly focus on EFL teaching and learning, and higher engineering education.
With the advancement of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), the stakeholders of the quality assurance in engineering education have been diversified. Especially, different stakeholders involve the quality assurance in engineering education with different attitudes and behaviors. Engineering education stakeholders have formed different groups representing different powers. It will help to optimize internal quality assurance mechanisms by exploring stakeholders. Thus, this research takes Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) as a case to study the power of quality assurance in engineering education from the perspective of Stakeholder Theory. The findings indicate that engineering education stakeholders have formed three main bodies representing administrative power, academic power, and student power, which play different roles and form different types of power participation; administrative power participates in the preparation and organization of program accreditation, participates in educational quality supervision, and guides teachers and students to participate in quality assurance; academic power participates in student learning evaluation and program continuous improvement, curriculum and teaching reform, teacher professional development activities; student power participates in the quality assurance both directly and indirectly. The engineering departments of the United States attach great importance to the collective responsibility of quality assurance in engineering education, and devote themselves to shaping the evaluation culture based on the participation of multiple stakeholders and forming a joint force for quality assurance in engineering education, which provides important enlightenment for the quality assurance in engineering education in other countries.
Li, M., & Zhao, M. (2023, June), Research on the Power of Quality Assurance in Engineering Education within Engineering Department-Case of Worcester Polytechnic Institute Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--44120
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015